Thursday, July 3, 2025
  • Login
Euro Times
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Finance
  • Business
  • World
  • Politics
  • Markets
  • Stock Market
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Investing
  • Health
  • Technology
  • Home
  • Finance
  • Business
  • World
  • Politics
  • Markets
  • Stock Market
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Investing
  • Health
  • Technology
Euro Times
No Result
View All Result

Quant Screening: Three Questions for Investment Managers

by Index Investing News
June 6, 2023
in Investing
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
0
Home Investing
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


Evaluating investment managers is a challenging endeavor. Why else would asset owners expend so much time and resources, often with the aid of consultants, to conduct manager searches? Proper manager selection and evaluation requires thorough due diligence, but a relatively simple filter can serve as a helpful initial screen of potential investment managers.

There are three basic questions that asset owners should ask of any quantitative manager before initiating their due diligence process with that manager. If a manager does not provide adequate responses, they may not merit further consideration. Though our focus is quantitative managers, the same questions also work for fundamental managers, especially in regards to the quantitative screens or signals they use in their investment processes.

1. What are the drivers of your investment process?

Investment managers should be able to explain what factors they consider most important to their investment decision making and provide some conceptual justification for them. For example, their equity factors ought to be economically intuitive and understandable rather than opaque or synthetic. As a case in point, consider the definition of the Value factor. A single understandable metric like price-to-book has advantages over hybrids such as a “Value” factor comprised of some combination of price-to-book and price-to-earnings.

Why avoid such hybrid approaches? First, the evidence that price-to-earnings is a rewarded risk factor has far weaker empirical support relative to price-to-book. Second, even if we were to use both metrics, a hybrid that combines the two individual metrics in some way, say 50% price-to-book and 50% price-to-earnings, does not make any economic sense. That is, what is the return stream of the hybrid “factor” a return stream of? Third, combining different metrics may give us exposures that we do not want. Finally, even if we combine factors as above, we will have to apply some form of weighting scheme, whether static or dynamic. But then we have to provide a justification for our weighting scheme. If our only justification is that it worked well in a backtest, then we are succumbing to the most fundamental error in both investing and statistics: We are basing what is supposed to be a generalizable investment strategy on an overfitted metric.

Thus, using a clear set of factors that makes economic sense and can be defended on conceptual grounds is critical to evaluating whether a manager has a firm and well-constructed investment process or is making investment decisions based on a flimsier set of considerations.

An important additional component of equity factor strategies is controlling the potential negative interaction effect among the various equity factors. For example, the stocks in a Value strategy have at least some exposure to Momentum and Size, among other factors. If the exposure is large and negative, then the strategy could wash away the premia that is being harvested from the Value exposure. Thus, managers must have a procedure in place that allows for factor tilts but controls for these negative interaction effects. If not, then a given strategy will stray from its stated mandate. Managers should be able to explain how their process ensures their intended exposures in the presence of interaction effects.

Finally, an important aspect of gauging a manager’s answers to our first question is their consistency. What if different members of an investment team, say the head of research and the senior portfolio managers, have divergent views on what the most important factors are in their investment process? Then maybe their strategy is not fully developed. This “inconsistency risk” can plague both quantitative and fundamental managers but is perhaps more common among fundamental managers who often have less disciplined investment processes relative to their quantitative peers.

2. What evidence is there that your investment process will be effective?

A well-constructed investment process should be validated through a large body of empirical evidence and a comprehensive array of statistical tests. For example, a quantitative process should be supported by very large data sets, tests that use different subsamples, and various types of simulations. All these validation methods should be documented, ideally in peer-reviewed journals. For example, the investment team at Scientific Beta has collectively published dozens of papers over the years that articulate its views and back up its approach to equity factor investing with evidence.

Why is publishing papers in journals useful? Because it gives the wider investment community the opportunity to evaluate an investment team’s ideas. And because the evaluators share no business interests with the authors, their assessments are more objective. Publishing research helps establish the legitimacy of quantitative investment processes. Not only does it provide a view into a manager’s investment methodology, but it also aligns a manager’s research efforts with genuine scientific practice.

In science, answers to questions are derived from consensus. That is, different research teams operating independently come to similar conclusions. Because of this, their results reinforce each other. If a manager cannot explain or provide any support, empirical or otherwise, why their process works, asset owners should take it as a red flag.

Of course, some investment firms do not publish their research because they say they want to protect the proprietary elements of their investment process, their ”secret sauce.” But that is not convincing. After all, other firms do publish their research without fear of misappropriation. Either way, a firm’s methodologies should be supported by both proprietary manager research and research external to the firm.

Tile for Gen Z and Investing: Social Media, Crypto, FOMO, and Family report

3. What risk controls are part of your investment process?

Ensuring that a strategy is delivering what it is supposed to and is not exposing itself to undesirable risks is integral to effective investment processes. For example, in an equity factor strategy, the goal is often providing focused exposure to one or more factors. So, a Value strategy’s return should be primarily driven by exposure to the Value factor. If a factor strategy’s return stream comes from other factors or the idiosyncratic risk of individual stocks, then unwanted risk exposures are creeping in. Thus, lack of risk control may lead to unintended consequences.

Model misspecification is a potential risk in any investment strategy. Quantitative strategies, in particular, often determine the asset weights in their portfolio using some form of optimization. While any optimization may be constrained, it nevertheless could unduly expose a portfolio to concentration risk in specific securities, regions, or sectors, among other types of risk. After all, no model is perfect, and every model processes inputs differently. As such, managers need to have controls in place to guard against any given model tilting the portfolio towards undesirable or overly concentrated exposures. Using more than one model to determine asset weights is one way to do this.

In applying any model, selecting what inputs to use is an important consideration. Does a process rely primarily on more stable metrics, such as volatility, or on more erratic variables, expected returns, for example? Managers must provide this information to assure asset owners that their models are robust and stable.

Graphic for Handbook of AI and Big data Applications in Investments

Concluding Thoughts

To be sure, these three questions are just the beginning of the due diligence process. However, as an initial filter, they are great starting points for evaluating any manager. If the answers to any of these questions are unsatisfactory, the manager’s process may have fundamental flaws, and the manager may be unsuitable for further vetting.

If you liked this post, don’t forget to subscribe to the Enterprising Investor.


All posts are the opinion of the author(s). As such, they should not be construed as investment advice, nor do the opinions expressed necessarily reflect the views of CFA Institute or the author’s employer.

Image credit: ©Getty Images / Alex Liew


Professional Learning for CFA Institute Members

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report professional learning (PL) credits earned, including content on Enterprising Investor. Members can record credits easily using their online PL tracker.

Joseph Simonian, PhD

Joseph Simonian, PhD, is senior investment strategist at Scientific Beta. He is a noted contributor to leading finance journals and is also a prominent speaker at investment events worldwide. Simonian is also currently the co-editor of the Journal of Financial Data Science and on the editorial board of The Journal of Portfolio Management. He holds a PhD from the University of California, Santa Barbara; an MA from Columbia University; and a BA from the University of California, Los Angeles.



Source link

Tags: InvestmentmanagersQuantQuestionsScreening
Previous Post

An “Anvil” is Coming to Commercial Real Estate

Next Post

What to expect when Signet Jewelers (SIG) reports Q1 earnings

Related Posts

Buyers Beware: 7 Red Flags That Signal a Private Market Reckoning

Buyers Beware: 7 Red Flags That Signal a Private Market Reckoning

by Mark J. Higgins, CFA, CFP
July 3, 2025
0

Within the historical past of each nice disaster, you will see some masterly little bit of stupidity set fireplace to...

Fed Independence Tested, but Investors Shouldn’t Expect a Pivot

Fed Independence Tested, but Investors Shouldn’t Expect a Pivot

by Martin Fridson, CFA
July 1, 2025
0

Traders betting on a near-term plunge in rates of interest could also be mistaking political theater for financial coverage actuality....

10 Best Dividend Stocks For The Long Run

10 Best Dividend Stocks For The Long Run

by Robert Ciura
July 1, 2025
0

Revealed on June thirtieth, 2025 by Bob Ciura Traders searching for the very best shares for the long term ought...

Will Palantir Technologies Ever Pay A Dividend?

Will Palantir Technologies Ever Pay A Dividend?

by Robert Ciura
June 30, 2025
0

Printed on June thirtieth, 2025 by Bob Ciura Palantir Applied sciences (PLTR) is likely one of the market’s premier development...

Hospitals in Trouble: A Financial Playbook for Leaders and Investors

Hospitals in Trouble: A Financial Playbook for Leaders and Investors

by Umer Saleem Zuberi, CFA
June 30, 2025
0

Hospitals are beneath stress — from labor prices to ransomware, margin squeezes to misgovernance. This publish explores the rising wave...

From Models to Markets: A Conversation with Kenneth Blay

From Models to Markets: A Conversation with Kenneth Blay

by Frank J. Fabozzi, CFA
June 26, 2025
0

Kenneth Blay, Head of Analysis-World Thought Management at Invesco, brings a novel perspective to funding analysis, drawing from greater than...

Next Post
What to expect when Signet Jewelers (SIG) reports Q1 earnings

What to expect when Signet Jewelers (SIG) reports Q1 earnings

At least 42 dead in Haiti after heavy weekend floods

At least 42 dead in Haiti after heavy weekend floods

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trump’s ‘big beautiful bill’ passes SALT deduction limit of ,000

Trump’s ‘big beautiful bill’ passes SALT deduction limit of $40,000

July 3, 2025
Democrats Vow To Tell Every Battleground Voter What Republicans Have Done To Them

Democrats Vow To Tell Every Battleground Voter What Republicans Have Done To Them

July 3, 2025
A Planet with a Death Wish: How HIP 67522 b Is Forcing Its Star to Explode

A Planet with a Death Wish: How HIP 67522 b Is Forcing Its Star to Explode

July 3, 2025
Chelsea vs Palmeiras: FIFA Club World Cup – teams, start time, lineup | Football News

Chelsea vs Palmeiras: FIFA Club World Cup – teams, start time, lineup | Football News

July 3, 2025
Dogecoin Could Detonate Shorty, Says Analyst—Here’s The Target

Dogecoin Could Detonate Shorty, Says Analyst—Here’s The Target

July 3, 2025
AEON Partners With Mesh to Unlock Crypto Payments From Major Exchanges and Wallets

AEON Partners With Mesh to Unlock Crypto Payments From Major Exchanges and Wallets

July 3, 2025
Euro Times

Get the latest news and follow the coverage of Business & Financial News, Stock Market Updates, Analysis, and more from the trusted sources.

CATEGORIES

  • Business
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Finance
  • Health
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Politics
  • Stock Market
  • Technology
  • Uncategorized
  • World

LATEST UPDATES

Trump’s ‘big beautiful bill’ passes SALT deduction limit of $40,000

Democrats Vow To Tell Every Battleground Voter What Republicans Have Done To Them

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact us

Copyright © 2022 - Euro Times.
Euro Times is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Finance
  • Business
  • World
  • Politics
  • Markets
  • Stock Market
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Investing
  • Health
  • Technology

Copyright © 2022 - Euro Times.
Euro Times is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In