Thursday, March 30, 2023
  • Login
Euro Times
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Finance
  • Business
  • World
  • Politics
  • Markets
  • Stock Market
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Investing
  • Health
  • Technology
  • Home
  • Finance
  • Business
  • World
  • Politics
  • Markets
  • Stock Market
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Investing
  • Health
  • Technology
Euro Times
No Result
View All Result

Incentives, Not Courts, Improve Health

by Byron Carson
October 9, 2022
in Finance
Reading Time: 5 mins read
A A
0
Home Finance
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


U.S. District Court Judge Reed O’Connor recently ruled to uphold the rights of employers granted in the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, rather than uphold a provision of the Affordable Care Act requiring employers to fund healthcare. The ultimate implications of the ruling are still developing, but already there is controversy.

Conflicting Rights Obscure Incentives

Many argue that the ruling jeopardizes employer-based healthcare, including insurance plans covering drugs that help lower the risk of contracting HIV. These are logical arguments on their face. If people cannot afford medicines like PrEP, for example, because their employer values adhering to religious beliefs more than paying for specific medical care, it will make such healthcare more expensive. Such outcomes could worsen individual and public health.

In a response to O’Connor’s ruling, Paul Kawata, Executive Director of National Minority AIDS Council (NMAC), stated that “This decision has the potential to cut off millions of Americans from the life-protecting medications they need.” Moreover, Kawata suggests that, “Leaders at the state and federal levels must take all necessary steps to protect access to these vital medications.” 

Kawata is not alone in his opposition. Joshua Cohen at Forbes suggests the ruling implicitly takes a “pro-death stance,” and Ian Millhiser at Vox says it is a disaster for public health. 

While such arguments are valid, they depict a narrow view of employers and their relationship with employees. The relationships between employers and employees are mutually beneficial and might often improve health.

Just because courts overturn mandates requiring employers provide healthcare, it does not necessarily follow that employers won’t provide healthcare for their employees, their families, and even a larger community. Religious-minded employers might still provide healthcare they find controversial.

Employers Face Incentives to Improve Health

Employers have provided health care for over a century, regardless of federal rules and court rulings, because they face incentives to attract employees, reduce turnover rates, increase productivity, and seek net revenue. Real wages, including salaries and healthcare benefits, are important ways to attract and maintain a workforce. 

Numerous examples throughout the 19th and 20th centuries demonstrate the prevalence of such incentives. Long before federal mandates in the United States, the owners and managers of coal mining companies provided sanitation services. Similarly, cotton textile mills and railroads provided mosquito control. Consider Jay Gould, chairman of the St. Louis Southwestern Railway. When he realized many of his workers were sick with malaria in the 1910s, he established a trust to finance subsequent mosquito control efforts, which ultimately helped to control the disease among his workforce.

Employees and employers, along with labor unions, also have a long history of cooperation as it relates to health. John Murray details how workers favored industrial sickness funds to provide insurance in the event of sickness or injury, especially between 1880 and 1940, which formed the basis for the American employer-based health insurance model.

Christy Ford Chapin notes that employers in the U.S. provided healthcare during the early 20th century for many reasons, among them improving working conditions and lowering the costs of insurance. Such services provided benefits to employer and employee alike, through improvements in health, increased productivity, and profits. 

Such incentives are not unique to the U.S. With the rising HIV epidemic in South Africa, for example, mining firms provided testing, antiretroviral therapies, and HIV-related healthcare to their employees. Their efforts became so extensive and successful they created the Aurum Institute, now one of the world’s leading public health research facilities. 

Workplace wellness programs are common. While their effects on health outcomes are mixed, employers can still use them to attract employees if they believe in the efficacy of such programs. Employers and health insurance plans provide other health-related perks too, from fitbits, gym memberships, and personal trainers, to flu shots and meditation sessions.

Labor Markets Facilitate Sorting

Healthcare is one of the ways employers attract a larger pool of employees, limit turnover, and increase productivity and net revenue. Such incentives remain regardless of whatever court rulings and federal requirements might impose.

Critics of O’Connor’s ruling might still be incensed, as these incentives might not directly help people who face higher healthcare costs. There is a silver lining, however, especially when labor markets are competitive.

In competitive labor markets, workers and employers cooperate to produce valuable goods, such as healthcare. Workers and employers who fail to produce such goods will tend to earn lower wages and/or lower profits. 

Employers that strongly adhere to their religious values, to the extent that they would refuse to cover some kinds of healthcare, lose opportunities to attract employees who value those healthcare goods. Strong religious adherence becomes costly to employers as current and future employees might look elsewhere for employment. Similarly, employers who are interested in attracting and maintaining relationships with employees, rather than whatever religious values they might have, are likely to provide the kind of healthcare employees most value. Those firms, rather than the religious-minded ones, will tend to fare better in a competitive labor market.

Byron B. Carson, III

Byron Carson

Byron Carson is an Assistant Professor of Economics and Business at Hampden-Sydney College, in Hampden-Sydney, Virginia. He teaches courses on introductory economics, money and banking, development economics, health economics, and urban economics.

Byron earned a Ph.D. in Economics in 2017 from George Mason University and a B.A. in Economics from Rhodes College in 2011. His research interests include economic epidemiology, public choice, and Austrian economics.

Get notified of new articles from Byron B. Carson, III and AIER.





Source link

Tags: CourtsHealthImproveincentives
Previous Post

AMD and Samsung report sales forecast cuts, join Nvidia and Intel on chip industry downturn

Next Post

Pink diamond sells for record $49.9 million at Hong Kong auction

Related Posts

Austerity for the Plebes, Bank Rescues for the Rich

by Yves Smith
March 30, 2023
0

Yves here. Supposedly super duper bank reforms after the crisis have done little to shore up confidence, particularly among the...

Commercial-property losses will add to banks’ woes

by Euro Times
March 30, 2023
0

Ask an investor to describe the outlook for commercial property and you will get a colourful response. “Office is a...

Governments Can’t Blame Inflation on Energy and Putin Anymore

by Daniel Lacalle
March 30, 2023
0

At the end of February 2023, the price of oil (WTI and Brent), Henry Hub and ICE natural gas, aluminum,...

Politics, Not Markets, Makes Banking Unstable

by Alexander W. Salter
March 30, 2023
0

Is fractional-reserve banking inherently unstable? Over at National Review, Edwin Burton, a visiting economics professor at the University of Virginia,...

Key Topics and Takeaways From ExchangeETF 2023

by Euro Times
March 29, 2023
0

By Michael Prendergast, SVP, Senior ETF Product Specialist, Ultimus Fund Solutions  The 2023 ExchangeETF Conference was an important gathering for...

£2bn poured into NS&I as savers seek security on deposits

by Anna Wise
March 29, 2023
0

For free real time breaking news alerts sent straight to your inbox sign up to our breaking news emailsSign up...

Next Post

Pink diamond sells for record $49.9 million at Hong Kong auction

African Wildlife Animal Trafficking Protection Program Announced By VETPAW

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Wall St opens higher as bank fears fade, focus on inflation data By Reuters

March 30, 2023

Terra Luna Classic Network Upgrade; Joint L1 Task Force Q2 Plan

March 30, 2023

Constellation Brands taps Tastemade to help draw new customers

March 30, 2023

Police shooting of Black man referred to UK prosecutors

March 30, 2023

Policymakers struggle to rein in sticky core inflation

March 30, 2023

Marketmind-World markets leaving March like a lamb By Reuters

March 30, 2023
Euro Times

Get the latest news and follow the coverage of Business & Financial News, Stock Market Updates, Analysis, and more from the trusted sources.

CATEGORIES

  • Business
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Finance
  • Health
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Politics
  • Stock Market
  • Technology
  • Uncategorized
  • World

LATEST UPDATES

Wall St opens higher as bank fears fade, focus on inflation data By Reuters

Terra Luna Classic Network Upgrade; Joint L1 Task Force Q2 Plan

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact us

Copyright © 2022 - Euro Times.
Euro Times is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Finance
  • Business
  • World
  • Politics
  • Markets
  • Stock Market
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Investing
  • Health
  • Technology

Copyright © 2022 - Euro Times.
Euro Times is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In