[ad_1]
This text was beforehand revealed September 19, 2019, and has been up to date with new info.
Within the U.S., an estimated 21 million American adults skilled no less than one main depressive episode in 2020.1 The reported numbers for the previous a number of years2 have persistently been highest amongst these aged between 18 and 25.3 Nevertheless, not solely is there proof that melancholy is vastly overdiagnosed, however there’s additionally proof displaying it is routinely mistreated.
With regard to overdiagnosis, it’s been ongoing for a very long time, with one 2013 research4 discovering solely 38.4% of individuals with clinician-identified melancholy really met the DSM-4 standards for a serious depressive episode, and solely 14.3% of seniors 65 and older met the factors.
As for therapy, the overwhelming majority are prescribed antidepressant medicine, regardless of the very fact there’s little to no proof to counsel they supply significant assist, and loads of proof displaying the harms are larger than sufferers are being informed.
In accordance with a 2017 research,5 1 in 6 People between the ages of 18 and 85 have been on psychiatric medicine, most of them antidepressants, and 84.3% reported long-term use (three years or extra). Out of 242 million U.S. adults, 12% have been discovered to have crammed a number of prescriptions for an antidepressant, particularly, in 2013. By 2021 within the midst of the pandemic, 1 in 4 People over age 18, or 50 million individuals, have been on prescription psychological well being medicine.6
In accordance with knowledge7 offered by a watchdog group in 2014, a whole bunch of hundreds of toddlers are additionally being medicated with highly effective psychiatric medicine, elevating severe moral questions, together with questions in regards to the future psychological and bodily well being of those youngsters.
And, a research revealed in The BMJ in 20138 discovered that “In utero publicity to each SSRIs and non-selective monoamine reuptake inhibitors (tricyclic antidepressants) was related to an elevated threat of autism spectrum issues, significantly with out mental incapacity” within the offspring.
Research are additionally shedding a lot wanted gentle on the addictive nature of many antidepressants, and exhibit that the advantages of those medicine have been overblown whereas their unwanted side effects — together with suicidal ideation — and have been downplayed and ignored for many years, putting sufferers at pointless threat.
The Chemical Imbalance Delusion
One researcher chargeable for elevating consciousness about these essential psychological well being points is professor Peter C. Gøtzsche, a Danish physician-researcher and outspoken critic of the drug trade (as his e book, “Lethal Medicines and Organized Crime: How Massive Pharma Has Corrupted Healthcare,”9 suggests).
Gøtzsche helped discovered the Cochrane Collaboration in 1993 and later launched the Nordic Cochrane Centre. In 2018, he was expelled by the Cochrane governing board following the publication of a scathing critique of a Cochrane overview of the HPV wherein he and his coauthors identified a number of methodological flaws and conflicts of curiosity.
Over the previous a number of years, Gøtzsche has revealed quite a lot of scientific papers on antidepressants and media articles and a e book discussing the findings. In a June 28, 2019 article,10 Gøtzsche addresses “the dangerous delusion” about chemical imbalances — a debunked speculation that continues to drive the usage of antidepressants to at the present time. He writes, partially:11
“Psychiatrists routinely inform their sufferers that they’re sick as a result of they’ve a chemical imbalance within the mind and they’ll obtain a drug that fixes this …
Final summer season, considered one of my researchers and I collected details about melancholy from 39 in style web sites in 10 nations, and we discovered that 29 (74%) web sites attributed melancholy to a chemical imbalance or claimed that antidepressants might repair or appropriate that imbalance …
It has by no means been attainable to indicate that frequent psychological issues begin with a chemical imbalance within the mind. The research which have claimed this are all unreliable.12
A distinction in dopamine ranges, for instance, between sufferers with schizophrenia and wholesome folks can’t inform us something about what began the psychosis … [I]f a lion assaults us, we get terribly frightened and produce stress hormones, however this doesn’t show that it was the stress hormones that made us scared.
Folks with psychoses have usually suffered traumatic experiences previously, so we should always see these traumas as contributing causal components and never cut back struggling to some biochemical imbalance that, if it exists in any respect, is extra more likely to be the results of the psychosis quite than its trigger.13
The parable about chemical imbalance could be very dangerous. It makes folks consider there’s something severely mistaken with them, and generally they’re even informed that it’s hereditary.
The results of that is that sufferers proceed to take dangerous medicine, 12 months after 12 months, even perhaps for the whole lot of their lives. They concern what would occur in the event that they stopped, significantly when the psychiatrists have informed them that their state of affairs is like sufferers with diabetes needing insulin.”
Actual Reason for Despair Is Usually Ignored
In accordance with Gøtzsche, there isn’t a identified psychological well being problem that’s brought on by an imbalance of mind chemical compounds. In lots of instances, the true trigger is unknown, however “fairly often, it’s a response to unhealthy dwelling situations,” he writes.14
He additionally cites the e book,15 “Nervousness — The Inside Story: How Organic Psychiatry Bought It Incorrect,” written by Dr. Niall McLaren, wherein the writer exhibits that nervousness is a significant factor in and set off of most psychiatric issues.
“A psychiatrist I respect extremely, who solely makes use of psychiatric medicine in uncommon instances … has mentioned that most individuals are depressed as a result of they reside miserable lives,” Gøtzsche writes.
“No drug may help them reside higher lives. It has by no means been proven in placebo-controlled trials {that a} psychiatric drug can enhance folks’s lives — e.g., assist them return to work, enhance their social relationships or efficiency at college, or forestall crime and delinquency. The medicine worsen folks’s lives, no less than in the long term.16“
Gøtzsche rightfully factors out that antipsychotic medicine create chemical imbalances; they do not repair them. As a gaggle, they’re additionally considerably misnamed, as they don’t handle psychotic states. Quite, they’re tranquilizers, rendering the affected person passive. Nevertheless, calming the affected person down doesn’t really assist them heal the underlying trauma that, in lots of instances, is what triggered the psychosis within the first place.
As famous in a single 2012 meta-analysis17 of research taking a look at childhood trauma — together with sexual abuse, bodily abuse, emotional/psychological abuse, neglect, parental dying and bullying — and subsequent threat of psychosis:
“There have been vital associations between adversity and psychosis throughout all analysis designs … Sufferers with psychosis have been 2.72 occasions extra more likely to have been uncovered to childhood adversity than controls … The estimated inhabitants attributable threat was 33% (16%-47%). These findings point out that childhood adversity is strongly related to elevated threat for psychosis.”
Economic system of Affect in Psychiatry
A associated article,18 written by investigative journalist Robert Whitaker in 2017, addresses the “economic system of affect” driving the usage of antidepressant medicine in psychiatric therapy — and the “social harm” that outcomes. As famous by Whitaker, psychological issues have been initially categorized in line with a illness mannequin in 1980 by the American Psychiatric Affiliation.
“We’re all conversant in the second ‘economic system of affect’ that has exerted a corrupting affect on psychiatry — pharmaceutical cash — however I consider the guild affect is actually the larger drawback,” he writes.
Whitaker particulars the corruption throughout the APA in his e book “Psychiatry Underneath the Affect,” one side of which is “the false story informed to the general public about medicine that fastened chemical imbalances within the mind.” Different types of corrupt habits embody:
- The biased designs of scientific trials to attain a predetermined end result
- Spinning outcomes to help preconceived conclusions
- Hiding poor long-term outcomes
- Increasing diagnostic classes for the aim of economic achieve
- Creating scientific trial tips that promote drug use
In his article, Whitaker goes on to dissect a 2017 overview19 revealed within the American Journal of Psychiatry, which Whitaker claims “defends the occupation’s present protocols for prescribing antipsychotics, which incorporates their common long-term use.”
As Whitaker factors out, there’s ample proof displaying antipsychotic medicine worsen outcomes over the long run in these identified with psychotic issues reminiscent of schizophrenia.
The overview in query, led by American psychiatrist Dr. Jeffrey A. Lieberman, was aimed toward answering persistent questions raised by the mounting of such proof. Alas, their conclusions dismissed issues that the present drug paradigm is perhaps doing extra hurt than good.
“In a subsequent press launch and a video for a Medscape commentary, Lieberman has touted it as proving that antipsychotics present an ideal profit, psychiatry’s protocols are simply nice, and that the critics are ‘nefarious’ people intent on doing hurt,” Whitaker writes.20
The Scientific Bias of Psychiatric Remedy
5 of the eight researchers listed on the overview have monetary ties to drug firms, three are audio system for a number of drug firms and all eight are psychiatrists, “and thus there’s a ‘guild’ curiosity current on this overview, on condition that they’re investigating whether or not considered one of their therapies is dangerous over the long-term,” Whitaker notes.21
Not surprisingly, the overview ignored research displaying damaging results, together with research displaying antipsychotics have a detrimental impact on mind quantity. What’s extra, whereas withdrawal research help the usage of antipsychotics as upkeep remedy over the long run, these research don’t handle how the medicine have an effect on sufferers’ long-term well being.
“They merely reveal that after an individual has stabilized on the treatment, going abruptly off the drug is more likely to result in relapse,” Whitaker writes.22 “The give attention to long-term outcomes, no less than as offered by critics, gives proof that psychiatry ought to undertake a selective-use protocol.
If first-episode sufferers are usually not instantly placed on antipsychotics, there’s a vital proportion that can get well, and this ‘spontaneous restoration’ places them onto an excellent long-term course. As for sufferers handled with the drugs, the purpose could be to reduce long-term use, as there may be proof that antipsychotics, on the entire, worsen long-term outcomes.”
Huge Majority of Psychotic Sufferers Are Harmed, Not Helped
In his deconstruction of Lieberman’s overview, Whitaker particulars how biased pondering influenced the overview’s conclusions. It is a quite lengthy article, however effectively value studying by way of if you wish to perceive how a scientific overview might be skewed to accord with a preconceived view.
Particulars I need to spotlight, nevertheless, embody findings referring to the quantity wanted to deal with (NNT) and the proportion of sufferers harmed by the routine use of antipsychotic medicine as a first-line therapy.
As famous by Whitaker, whereas placebo-controlled research reveal the effectiveness of a drug in comparison with an inert substance, they don’t successfully reveal the ratio of profit versus hurt among the many affected person inhabitants. NNT refers back to the variety of sufferers that need to take the drug with a purpose to get one optimistic response.
A meta-analysis cited in Lieberman’s overview had an NNT of 6, that means that six sufferers should take the drug to ensure that one to learn from the therapy. The remaining 5 sufferers — 83% — are doubtlessly harmed by the therapy. As famous by Whitaker:23
“The purpose … is that this: reviewers looking for to advertise their drug therapy as efficient will look solely at whether or not it produces a superior response to placebo. This results in a one-size-fits-all protocol.
Reviewers that need to assess the benefit-harm impact of the therapy on all sufferers will take a look at NNT numbers. On this occasion, the NNT calculations argue for selective use of the medicine …”
Antidepressants Are Not Useful within the Lengthy Time period
Whereas sometimes not as harmful as antipsychotics, antidepressants additionally go away a path of destruction of their wake. A scientific overview24 by Gøtzsche revealed in 2019 discovered research assessing hurt from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fail to supply a transparent and correct image of the harms, and due to this fact “can’t be used to analyze persistent harms of antidepressants.”
On this overview, Gøtzsche and colleagues sought to evaluate “harms of SSRIs … that persist after finish of drug consumption.” The first outcomes included mortality, useful outcomes, high quality of life and core psychiatric occasions. In all, 22 papers on 12 SSRI trials have been included. Gøtzsche discovered a number of distinct issues with these trials. For starters, solely two of the 12 trials had a drop-out price under 20%.
Gøtzsche and his staff additionally be aware that “End result reporting was much less thorough throughout follow-up than for the intervention interval and solely two trials maintained the blind throughout follow-up.” Importantly, although, the entire 22 papers got here to the conclusion that “the medicine weren’t helpful in the long run.”
One other essential discovering was that every one trials both “reported harms outcomes selectively or didn’t report any,” and “Solely two trials reported on any of our main outcomes (college attendance and variety of heavy ingesting days).”
A couple of years later, in April 2022, a research utilizing knowledge from the USA’ Medical Expenditures Panel Survey for sufferers who had melancholy discovered, “The true-world impact of utilizing antidepressant drugs doesn’t proceed to enhance sufferers” health-related high quality of life (HRQoL) over time.25
Antidepressants Are Extra Addictive Than Admitted
In a June 4, 2019, article,26 “The Despair Tablet Epidemic,” Gøtzsche writes that antidepressant medicine:
“… shouldn’t have related results on melancholy; they enhance the danger of suicide and violence; and so they make it harder for sufferers to reside regular lives.27 They need to due to this fact be averted.
We have now been fooled by the drug trade, corrupt medical doctors on trade payroll, and by our drug regulators.28 Absolutely, many sufferers and medical doctors consider the capsules are useful, however they can not know this, as a result of folks are inclined to turn into significantly better with time even when they aren’t handled.29
For this reason we’d like placebo-controlled trials to search out out what the medicine do to folks. Sadly, just about all trials are flawed, exaggerate the advantages of the medicine, and underestimate their harms.”30
Addictive Nature of Antidepressants Skews Outcomes
In his article,31 Gøtzsche opinions a number of of the methods utilized in antidepressant drug trials to magnify advantages and underestimate the harms. One little-known reality that helps skew research ends in the drug’s favor is the truth that antidepressants are usually way more addictive than formally admitted. He explains how this conveniently hides the skewing of outcomes as follows:32
“Nearly all sufferers within the trials are already on a drug much like the one being examined towards placebo. Subsequently, because the medicine are addictive, a few of the sufferers will get abstinence signs … when randomized to placebo …
These abstinence signs are similar to these sufferers expertise once they attempt to cease benzodiazepines. It’s no marvel that new medicine outperform the placebo in sufferers who’ve skilled hurt on account of chilly turkey results.
To learn the way lengthy sufferers must proceed taking medicine, so-called upkeep (withdrawal) research have been carried out, however such research are also compromised by chilly turkey results. Main psychiatrists do not perceive this, or they fake they do not.
Most interpret the upkeep research of melancholy capsules to imply that these medicine are very efficient at stopping new episodes of melancholy and that sufferers ought to due to this fact proceed taking the medicine for years and even for all times.”
Scientific Literature Helps Actuality of Person Complaints
Through the years, a number of research on the dependence and withdrawal reactions related to SSRIs and different psychiatric medicine have been revealed, together with the next:
• In a 2011 paper33 within the journal Dependancy, Gøtzsche and his staff regarded on the distinction between dependence and withdrawal reactions by evaluating benzodiazepines and SSRIs. Benzodiazepines are identified to trigger dependence, whereas SSRIs are mentioned to not be addictive.
Regardless of such claims, Gøtzsche’s staff discovered that “discontinuation signs have been described with comparable phrases for benzodiazepines and SSRIs and have been very comparable for 37 of 42 recognized signs described as withdrawal reactions,” which led them to conclude that:
“Withdrawal reactions to selective serotonin re‐uptake inhibitors look like much like these for benzodiazepines; referring to those reactions as a part of a dependence syndrome within the case of benzodiazepines, however not selective serotonin re‐uptake inhibitors, doesn’t appear rational.”
• Two years later, in 2013, Gøtzsche’s staff revealed a paper34 within the Worldwide Journal of Threat & Security in Medication, wherein they analyzed “communications from drug companies about benzodiazepine and SSRI withdrawal reactions over time.”
By looking the web sites of drug companies in Europe, the U.S., U.Okay. and Denmark, they discovered that it took years earlier than drug regulators lastly acknowledged the truth of benzodiazepine dependence and SSRI withdrawal reactions and commenced informing prescribers and sufferers about these dangers.
A big a part of the issue, they discovered, is that drug companies depend on spontaneous reporting of adversarial results, which “results in underestimation and delayed details about the issues.”
In conclusion, they state that “Given the expertise with the benzodiazepines, we consider the regulatory our bodies ought to have required research from the producers that might have elucidated the dependence potential of the SSRIs earlier than advertising authorization was granted.”
• A 2019 paper35 within the Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences journal notes “It took virtually 20 years after the SSRIs entered the marketplace for the primary systematic overview to be revealed.” It additionally factors out that opinions claiming withdrawal results to be delicate, transient in length and uncommon “was at odds with the sparse however rising proof base.”
In actuality, “What the scientific literature reveals is in shut settlement with the hundreds of service consumer testimonies out there on-line in giant boards. It means that withdrawal reactions are fairly frequent, that they could final from a couple of weeks to a number of months and even longer, and that they’re usually extreme.”
Antidepressants Enhance Your Threat of Suicide and Violence
In his June 2019 article,36 Gøtzsche additionally stresses the truth that antidepressants might be deadly. In considered one of his research,37 revealed in 2016, he discovered antidepressants “double the prevalence of occasions that may result in suicide and violence in wholesome grownup volunteers.”
Different analysis38 has proven they “enhance aggression in youngsters and adolescents by an element of two to three — an essential discovering contemplating the numerous college shootings the place the killers have been on melancholy capsules,” Gøtzsche writes.
In middle-aged girls with stress urinary incontinence, the selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) duloxetine, which can also be used to deal with incontinence, has been proven to double the danger of a psychotic episode and enhance the danger of violence and suicide 4 to 5 occasions,39 main the authors to conclude that harms outweighed the advantages.
“I’ve described the soiled tips and scientific dishonesty concerned when drug firms and main psychiatrists strive convincing us that these medicine defend towards suicide and different types of violence,”40 Gøtzsche writes.41 “Even the FDA was compelled to present in when it admitted in 2007, no less than not directly, that melancholy capsules could cause suicide and insanity at any age.
There isn’t a doubt that the large use of melancholy capsules is dangerous. In all nations the place this relationship has been examined, the sharp rise in incapacity pensions attributable to psychiatric issues has coincided with the rise of psychiatric drug utilization, and melancholy capsules are these that are used essentially the most by far. This isn’t what one would count on if the medicine have been useful.”
Drugmaker Lied About Paxil’s Suicide Threat
In 2017, Wendy Dolin was awarded $3 million by a jury in a lawsuit towards GlaxoSmithKline, the maker of Paxil. Dolin’s husband dedicated suicide six days after taking his first dose of a Paxil generic, and proof introduced forth within the case convincingly confirmed his suicide was the results of the drug, not emotional stress or psychological sickness.42
The authorized staff behind that victory, Baum Hedlund Aristei Goldman, additionally represented different victims of Paxil-induced violence and dying. On the time, lawyer R. Brent Wisner mentioned:43
“The Dolin verdict despatched a transparent message to GSK and different drug producers that hiding knowledge and manipulating science won’t be tolerated … In the event you create a drug and know that it poses severe dangers, no matter whether or not customers use the model title or generic model of that drug, you’ve got an obligation to warn.”
GSK’s personal scientific placebo-controlled trials really revealed topics on Paxil had practically 9 occasions the danger of making an attempt or committing suicide than the placebo group. To achieve drug approval, GSK misrepresented this stunning knowledge, falsely reporting the next variety of suicide makes an attempt within the placebo group and deleting a few of the suicide makes an attempt within the drug group.
An inner GSK evaluation of its suicide knowledge additionally confirmed that “sufferers taking Paxil have been practically seven occasions extra more likely to try suicide than these on placebo,” Baum Hedlund Aristei Goldman reviews, including:44
“Jurors within the Dolin trial additionally heard from psychiatrist David Healy, one of many world’s foremost consultants on Paxil and medicines in its class … Healy informed the jurors that Paxil and medicines like it will probably create in some folks a state of maximum ’emotional turmoil’ and intense interior restlessness generally known as akathisia …
‘Folks have described it like a state worse than dying. Loss of life might be a blessed aid. I need to soar out of my pores and skin,’ Dr. Healy mentioned. Wholesome volunteer research have discovered that akathisia can occur even to folks with no psychiatric situation who take the drug …
One other Paxil facet impact identified to extend the danger of suicide is emotional blunting … apathy or emotional indifference … [E]motional blunting, mixed with akathisia, can result in a psychological state wherein a person has ideas of harming themselves or others, however is ‘numbed’ to the implications of their actions. Medication within the Paxil class may trigger somebody to ‘go psychotic, turn into delirious,’ Dr. Healy defined.”
Tons of of 1000’s of Toddlers on Psychiatric Medication
Contemplating the numerous severe psychological and bodily dangers related to psychiatric medicine, it is stunning to study that a whole bunch of hundreds of American toddlers are on them. In 2014, the Residents Fee on Human Rights, a psychological well being watchdog group, highlighted knowledge displaying that in 2013:45
- 274,000 infants aged 1 and youthful got psychiatric medicine — Of those, 249,699 have been on anti-anxiety meds like Xanax; 26,406 have been on antidepressants reminiscent of Prozac or Paxil, 1,422 have been on ADHD medicine reminiscent of Ritalin and Adderall, and 654 have been on antipsychotics reminiscent of Risperdal and Zyprexa
- Within the toddler class (2- to 3-year-olds), 318,997 have been on anti-anxiety medicine, 46,102 have been on antidepressants, 10,000 have been prescribed ADHD medicine and three,760 have been on antipsychotics
- Amongst youngsters aged 5 and youthful, 1,080,168 have been on psychiatric medicine
These are stunning figures that problem logic. How and why are so many youngsters, infants even, on addictive and dangerously mind-altering drugs? Contemplating these statistics are 6 years outdated, chances are high they’re even larger as we speak. Simply what is going to occur to all of those kids as they develop up? As talked about within the article:46
“Relating to the psychiatric medicine used to deal with ADHD, these are known as ‘kiddie cocaine’ for a motive. Ritalin (methylphenidate), Adderall (amphetamine) and Concerta are all thought-about by the federal authorities as Schedule II medicine — essentially the most addictive.
ADHD medicine even have severe unwanted side effects reminiscent of agitation, mania, aggressive or hostile habits, seizures, hallucinations, and even sudden dying, in line with the Nationwide Institutes of Well being …
So far as antipsychotics, antianxiety medicine and antidepressants, the FDA and worldwide drug regulatory companies cite unwanted side effects together with, however not restricted to, psychosis, mania, suicidal ideation, coronary heart assault, stroke, diabetes, and even sudden dying.”
Youngsters More and more Prescribed Psych Medication Off-Label
Making issues even worse, latest analysis exhibits the variety of youngsters being prescribed treatment off-label can also be on the rise. An instance provided by StudyFinds.org,47 which reported the findings, is “a physician recommending antidepressant treatment for ADHD signs.”
The research,48 revealed within the journal Pediatrics, checked out traits in off-label drug prescriptions made for kids underneath the age of 18 by office-based physicians between 2006 and 2015. Findings revealed:
“Physicians ordered ≥1 off-label systemic drug at 18.5% of visits, normally (74.6%) due to unapproved situations. Off-label ordering was most typical proportionally in neonates (83%) and in absolute phrases amongst adolescents (322 orders out of 1000 visits).
Off-label ordering was related to feminine intercourse, subspecialists, polypharmacy, and power situations. Charges and causes for off-label orders diversified significantly by age. Relative and absolute charges of off-label orders rose over time. Amongst frequent lessons, off-label orders for antihistamines and a number of other psychotropics elevated over time …
US office-based physicians have ordered systemic medicine off label for kids at growing charges, most frequently for unapproved situations, regardless of latest efforts to extend proof and drug approvals for kids.”
The researchers have been stunned by the findings, and expressed severe concern over this pattern. Whereas authorized, lots of the medicine prescribed off-label haven’t been correctly examined to make sure security and efficacy for younger youngsters and adolescents.
As famous by senior writer Daniel Horton, assistant professor of pediatrics and pediatric rheumatologist at Rutgers Robert Wooden Johnson Medical Faculty, “We don’t all the time perceive how off-label drugs will have an effect on youngsters, who don’t all the time reply to drugs as adults do. They might not reply as desired to those medicine and will expertise dangerous results.”
In 2020 psychological well being consultants and reviewers have been nonetheless at-odds over prescribing these medicine for kids, but hesitant to name a cease to it:49
“Antidepressants are prescribed for the therapy of quite a lot of psychiatric issues in youngsters and adolescents, nevertheless there may be nonetheless controversy about whether or not they need to be used on this inhabitants …
Remedy choices must be tailor-made to sufferers on a person foundation, so we advocate clinicians, sufferers and coverage makers to seek advice from the proof supplied within the current meta-review and make choices about the usage of antidepressants in youngsters and adolescents taking into consideration quite a lot of scientific and private variables.”
Educate Your self Concerning the Dangers
In the event you, your baby or one other member of the family is on a psychiatric drug, I urge you to teach your self in regards to the true dangers and to contemplate switching to safer options. Relating to youngsters, I can’t fathom a state of affairs wherein a toddler would want a psychiatric drug and I discover it stunning that there are such a lot of medical doctors on the market that, based mostly on a subjective analysis, would deem a psychiatric drug essential.
[ad_2]
Source link