Friday, May 23, 2025
  • Login
Euro Times
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Finance
  • Business
  • World
  • Politics
  • Markets
  • Stock Market
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Investing
  • Health
  • Technology
  • Home
  • Finance
  • Business
  • World
  • Politics
  • Markets
  • Stock Market
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Investing
  • Health
  • Technology
Euro Times
No Result
View All Result

Quality Closed-End Fund Report, November 2022

by Euro Times
December 6, 2022
in Stock Market
Reading Time: 12 mins read
A A
0
Home Stock Market
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter


cemagraphics

Author’s note: This article was released to CEF/ETF Income Laboratory members on November 27, 2022. Please check the latest data before investing.

“Quality” Closed-End Fund Report

Quantitative screens help to rapidly narrow down attractive candidates from the database of 500-plus closed-end funds for further due diligence and investigation.

Image

Income Lab

Based on feedback from members, it seems that a very many number of investors, understandably, place a great emphasis on coverage and return of capital. While I’m not going to rehash the entire ROC argument here (it is suffice to say that the issue is much more complicated than “ROC = bad”), some investors may consider a fund with over 100% coverage to be attractive simply because they know that the distributions are being covered by earnings. Such a fund may be at lower risk of a distribution cut, which can cause devastating impacts to a fund’s market price and may even afford to raise its distribution in the future.

What does the “quality” label indicate? Simply put, it means that the distribution coverage is greater than 100%. However, please note these caveats: Firstly, coverage ratios are calculated using earnings data from CEFConnect. Although there are sometimes discrepancies with CEFConnect’s data, this allows us to automate the calculation process for the entire universe, and we consider it to be sufficient for a preliminary screen anyway. Before buying or selling any fund, it’s recommended to independently verify the coverage ratios from the individual fund annual/semi-annual reports themselves. Secondly, having a coverage ratio >100% does not guarantee that the fund’s distribution is secure. Many funds reduce their distributions periodically in line with market conditions in order to maintain good coverage. Thirdly, a coverage cut-off ratio of 100% is, ultimately, an arbitrary number. A fund with 99.9% coverage will be excluded from the rankings, whereas funds with 100.1% coverage will be considered, even though only a sliver of coverage separates the two.

The coverage ratio is calculated by dividing the earnings/share number provided by CEFConnect on the “distributions” tab by the distribution/share. CEFdata also provides earning coverage numbers as well.

I hope that these rankings of quality CEFs will provide fertile ground for further exploration.

Key to table headings:

P/D = premium/discount

Z = 1-year z-score

Lev = leverage

BE = baseline expense

Cov = coverage

Data were taken from the close of November 25th, 2022.

1. Top 10 widest quality discounts

The following data show the 10 CEFs with the highest discounts and coverage >100%. Yields, z-scores, and leverage are shown for comparison.

CEF Category P/D Yield Z Lev BE Cov
(HFRO) Senior Loans -23.39% 8.12% 0.1 12% 1.61% 166%
(SRV) MLPs -16.67% 15.29% 0.3 14% 2.21% 107%
(KSM) National Munis -13.85% 4.39% -1.3 44% 1.05% 135%
(EVM) California Munis -13.68% 4.20% -0.8 45% 1.11% 125%
(CXH) National Munis -13.60% 4.10% -0.7 39% 1.17% 124%
(NQP) Single-state Munis -13.51% 3.93% -1.0 41% 0.97% 121%
(VPV) Single-state Munis -13.33% 4.63% -0.8 40% 1.11% 106%
(BFZ) California Munis -13.28% 3.75% -0.6 41% 1.01% 124%
(CEV) California Munis -13.25% 4.45% -0.8 42% 1.10% 107%
(FMN) National Munis -13.11% 4.65% -1.0 45% 1.00% 119%

Chart

Income Lab

2. Top 10 best quality z-scores

CEFs with the best (most negative) z-scores are potential buy candidates. The following data show the 10 CEFs with the lowest z-scores. Premium/discount, yields, and leverage are shown for comparison. Only funds with coverage >100% are considered.

CEF Category Z P/D Yield Lev BE Cov
(NOM) Single-state Munis -3.3 -6.50% 3.62% 41% 1.34% 140%
(DFP) Preferreds -1.4 -6.00% 7.31% 39% 1.06% 125%
(FLC) Preferreds -1.3 -7.04% 7.79% 40% 1.21% 120%
(KSM) National Munis -1.3 -13.85% 4.39% 44% 1.05% 135%
(ETX) National Munis -1.3 -1.53% 3.98% 36% 1.03% 109%
(ETX) National Munis -1.3 -1.53% 3.98% 36% 1.03% 109%
(DSM) National Munis -1.3 -10.92% 4.57% 35% 0.84% 129%
(FFC) Preferreds -1.3 -3.48% 7.75% 39% 0.86% 120%
(JPT) Preferreds -1.2 -8.62% 8.03% 36% 1.31% 102%
(MPA) Single-state Munis -1.2 -11.59% 4.69% 42% 1.24% 108%

Chart

Income Lab

3. Top 20 highest quality yields

Some readers are mostly interested in obtaining income from their CEFs, so the following data presents the top 20 highest-yielding CEFs. I’ve also included the premium/discount and z-score data for reference. Before going out and buying all 10 funds from the list, some words of caution: [i] higher yields generally indicate higher risk, and [ii] some of these funds trade at a premium, meaning you will be buying them at a price higher than the intrinsic value of the assets (which is why I’ve included the premium/discount and z-score data for consideration). Only funds with coverage >100% are considered. To make the charts more manageable, I’ve split the funds into two groups of 10.

CEF Category Yield P/D Z Lev BE Cov
(OXLC) Senior Loans 17.59% 7.11% -0.3 38% 7.90% 115%
(SRV) MLPs 15.29% -16.67% 0.3 14% 2.21% 107%
(PDI) Multisector Income 13.49% 5.65% 0.2 48% 2.01% 106%
(BWG) Global Income 13.29% -11.44% -0.2 44% 2.46% 104%
(RCS) Investment Grade 11.65% 18.47% 1.7 46% 0.98% 109%
(HIX) High Yield 11.49% 1.39% 1.0 32% 1.29% 109%
(HIX) High Yield 11.49% 1.39% 1.0 32% 1.29% 109%
(DSL) Global Income 11.45% -3.67% 1.4 34% 1.50% 116%
(WDI) Multisector Income 11.27% -10.96% 0.0 34% 1.64% 106%
(EHI) High Yield 11.15% -6.60% 0.5 36% 1.50% 121%
(KIO) High Yield 10.96% -9.08% -0.2 43% 2.12% 106%
(EMD) Emerging Market Income 10.69% -10.37% 0.2 31% 1.30% 113%
(PDO) Global Income 10.68% -0.90% 1.0 49% 2.15% 114%
(HNW) High Yield 10.48% -11.57% -1.0 36% 1.58% 118%
(PHT) High Yield 10.20% -10.45% -0.6 34% 1.14% 117%
(ARDC) Senior Loans 10.18% -11.23% -0.7 23% 2.08% 110%
(BGH) High Yield 9.67% -10.38% -0.2 25% 1.42% 120%
(GDO) Global Income 9.52% -3.92% -0.4 31% 1.26% 111%
(HYB) High Yield 8.54% -9.60% 0.1 32% 1.13% 100%
(JPC) Preferreds 8.45% -5.04% 0.1 39% 1.34% 104%

Chart

Income Lab

Chart

Income Lab

4. Top 10 best combination of quality yield and discount

For possible buy candidates, it’s probably a good idea to consider both yield and discount. Buying a CEF with both a high yield and discount not only gives you the opportunity to capitalize from discount contraction, but you also get “free” alpha every time the distribution is paid out. This is because paying out a distribution is effectively the same as liquidating the fund at NAV and returning the capital to the unitholders. I considered several ways to rank CEFs by a composite metric of both yield and discount. The simplest would be yield + discount. However, I disregarded this because yields and discounts may have different ranges of absolute values and a sum would be biased toward the larger set of values. I finally settled on the multiplicative product, yield x discount. This is because I consider a CEF with 7% yield and 7% discount to be more desirable than a fund with 2% yield and 12% discount, or 12% yield and 2% discount, even though each pair of quantities sum to 14%. Multiplying yield and discount together biases toward funds with both high yield and discount. Since discount is negative and yield is positive, the more negative the “DxY” metric, the better. Only funds with >100% coverage are considered. The DxY score is scaled by 100.

CEF Category P/D Yield Z DxY Lev BE Cov
(SRV) MLPs -16.67% 15.29% 0.3 -2.5 14% 2.21% 107%
(HFRO) Senior Loans -23.39% 8.12% 0.1 -1.9 12% 1.61% 166%
(BWG) Global Income -11.44% 13.29% -0.2 -1.5 44% 2.46% 104%
(WDI) Multisector Income -10.96% 11.27% 0.0 -1.2 34% 1.64% 106%
(HNW) High Yield -11.57% 10.48% -1.0 -1.2 36% 1.58% 118%
(ARDC) Senior Loans -11.23% 10.18% -0.7 -1.1 23% 2.08% 110%
(EMD) Emerging Market Income -10.37% 10.69% 0.2 -1.1 31% 1.30% 113%
(PHT) High Yield -10.45% 10.20% -0.6 -1.1 34% 1.14% 117%
(BGH) High Yield -10.38% 9.67% -0.2 -1.0 25% 1.42% 120%
(KIO) High Yield -9.08% 10.96% -0.2 -1.0 43% 2.12% 106%

Chart

Income Lab

5. Top 10 best combination of quality yield, discount, and z-score

This is my favorite metric because it takes into account all three factors that I always consider when buying or selling CEFs: Yield, discount, and z-score. The composite metric simply multiplies the three quantities together. A screen is applied to only include CEFs with a negative one-year z-score. As both discount and z-score are negative while yield is positive, the more positive the “DxYxZ” metric, the better. Only funds with >100% coverage are considered. The DxYxZ score is scaled by 100.

CEF Category P/D Yield Z DxYxZ Lev BE Cov
(HNW) High Yield -11.57% 10.48% -1.0 1.2 36% 1.58% 118%
(JPT) Preferreds -8.62% 8.03% -1.2 0.8 36% 1.31% 102%
(KSM) National Munis -13.85% 4.39% -1.3 0.8 44% 1.05% 135%
(WIW) Investment Grade -13.06% 6.99% -0.9 0.8 38% 0.68% 212%
(NOM) Single-state Munis -6.50% 3.62% -3.3 0.8 41% 1.34% 140%
(ARDC) Senior Loans -11.23% 10.18% -0.7 0.8 23% 2.08% 110%
(WIA) Investment Grade -12.78% 6.05% -1.0 0.8 41% 0.75% 249%
(BSL) Senior Loans -10.09% 7.78% -0.9 0.7 36% 1.77% 102%
(FLC) Preferreds -7.04% 7.79% -1.3 0.7 40% 1.21% 120%
(DSM) National Munis -10.92% 4.57% -1.3 0.6 35% 0.84% 129%

Chart

Income Lab



Source link

Tags: closedendfundNovemberqualityReport
Previous Post

Rachel Maddow Raises An Interesting Question About Anti-LGBTQ Extremists And Infrastructure Sabotage

Next Post

Stocks ease from 3-month highs, dollar firms up on strong U.S. data By Reuters

Related Posts

2 BDCs That Qualify For The Retirement Earnings League

2 BDCs That Qualify For The Retirement Earnings League

by Index Investing News
May 23, 2025
0

This textual content was written by Roberts Berzins has over a decade of experience throughout the financial administration serving to...

QQQI: It Passed The Test (Upgrade) (NASDAQ:QQQI)

QQQI: It Passed The Test (Upgrade) (NASDAQ:QQQI)

by John Bowman
May 23, 2025
0

This text was written byComply withJohn "Jack" Bowman is a registered funding advisor, economics educator, analysis analyst, and commentator from...

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Company 2025 This fall – Outcomes – Earnings Name Presentation (NYSE:BAH)

Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Company 2025 This fall – Outcomes – Earnings Name Presentation (NYSE:BAH)

by Index Investing News
May 23, 2025
0

Looking for Alpha’s transcripts workers is accountable for the occasion of all of our transcript-related initiatives. We at current publish...

Corning Stock: An Unexpected Picks And Shovels Option In AI (GLW)

Corning Stock: An Unexpected Picks And Shovels Option In AI (GLW)

by Gen Z Investor
May 23, 2025
0

This text was written byObserveI'm a devoted monetary threat supervisor and investor specializing in financials, client, and know-how industries. I've...

PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund Q1 2025 Commentary (Mutual Fund:PJDZX)

PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund Q1 2025 Commentary (Mutual Fund:PJDZX)

by Index Investing News
May 23, 2025
0

PGIM Investments, a subsidiary of PFI, is an funding adviser and the funding supervisor to all PGIM US open-end funding...

Turning Surplus Attire into Sustainable Success

Turning Surplus Attire into Sustainable Success

by Index Investing News
May 22, 2025
0

The model commerce is at a crossroads. Quick improvement cycles and rising return prices are fueling an unprecedented surplus of...

Next Post
Stocks ease from 3-month highs, dollar firms up on strong U.S. data By Reuters

Stocks ease from 3-month highs, dollar firms up on strong U.S. data By Reuters

The Conflict In Ukraine Has Evolved Into A War Between The United States And Russia – Investment Watch

The Conflict In Ukraine Has Evolved Into A War Between The United States And Russia – Investment Watch

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

BlackRock Leads Historic 4M BTC ETF Inflows as Trump Tackles 0,000,000 EU Trade Deficit

BlackRock Leads Historic $934M BTC ETF Inflows as Trump Tackles $250,000,000 EU Trade Deficit

May 23, 2025
German court takes a stand against manipulative cookie banners

German court takes a stand against manipulative cookie banners

May 23, 2025
Investigating Biden's Pardons and Autopen Use

Investigating Biden's Pardons and Autopen Use

May 23, 2025
Bitcoin balance sheet adoption could hit 20% of BTC supply by 2026

Bitcoin balance sheet adoption could hit 20% of BTC supply by 2026

May 23, 2025
Fury as ‘Brit’ pole-dancers swing from hallowed Greek landmark as local says ‘would they do it at Buckingham Palace?’

Fury as ‘Brit’ pole-dancers swing from hallowed Greek landmark as local says ‘would they do it at Buckingham Palace?’

May 23, 2025
House Republican ‘big beautiful’ tax bill favors the rich

House Republican ‘big beautiful’ tax bill favors the rich

May 23, 2025
Euro Times

Get the latest news and follow the coverage of Business & Financial News, Stock Market Updates, Analysis, and more from the trusted sources.

CATEGORIES

  • Business
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Finance
  • Health
  • Investing
  • Markets
  • Politics
  • Stock Market
  • Technology
  • Uncategorized
  • World

LATEST UPDATES

BlackRock Leads Historic $934M BTC ETF Inflows as Trump Tackles $250,000,000 EU Trade Deficit

German court takes a stand against manipulative cookie banners

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact us

Copyright © 2022 - Euro Times.
Euro Times is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Finance
  • Business
  • World
  • Politics
  • Markets
  • Stock Market
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Investing
  • Health
  • Technology

Copyright © 2022 - Euro Times.
Euro Times is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In