Nike Sued For Closing Its NFT Platform RTFKT

Nike, one of many world’s largest luxurious trend manufacturers and as soon as a crypto market investor, has been served with a category motion lawsuit for abandoning the purchasers of its Nike-themed non-fungible tokens and different crypto objects. The NFT and crypto merchants have complained that they suffered large losses after the closure of the RTFKT, its digital asset incubation studio, and NFT market.

👟 Nike faces a $5m lawsuit from buyers claiming its abrupt NFT enterprise shutdown brought on heavy monetary losses.#Nike #NFTshttps://t.co/QueluJPH7I

— Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) April 28, 2025

Vogue Model Nike Sued Over RTFKT Closure

On Friday, April 26, 2025, a gaggle of crypto and non-fungible token buyers, led by Australian resident Jagdeep Cheema, filed a category motion earlier than the Brooklyn, New York, federal court docket in opposition to Nike. Within the proposed cost sheet, these buyers complained that they suffered large losses when the athletic put on firm and trend model ‘Nike’ abruptly closed RTFKT, the enterprise that created Clone X digital property.

The Nike-themed NFT buyers began getting agitated final week after a heated debate erupted on X after some crypto and non-fungible token customers observed a wierd error on the Clone X non-fungible token collections. Within the Clone X NFT assortment, there isn’t a seen artwork, with non-fungible token holders left solely damaged hyperlinks and NFT manufacturing numbers. Nike defended the error, blaming Cloudflare for proscribing entry to the art work for the CloneX NFT assortment.

> Be CloneX
> Make $81.3M from NFT gross sales
> Get one other $37.8M from royalties
> Airdrop sneaker coupons
> Go silent
> Shut down
> Don’t pay for servers
> Holders left with a damaged hyperlink and a dream pic.twitter.com/rSWxHrTWte

— Pix🔎 (@PixOnChain) April 24, 2025

Based someday in 2020, RTFKT was a digital asset incubation studio, acknowledged within the NFT marketplace for leveraging in-game engines, world-class design, and AR to create one-of-a-kind digital property. RTFKT began rising in recognition after the launch of the Clone X non-fungible token assortment. Clone X is an NFT assortment that includes a restricted version of 20,000 NFTs hosted on the Ethereum blockchain community.

The CloneX NFT assortment continued to realize traction amongst merchants, with its ground value worth surging to document heights. On the time, Clone X recorded some jaw-breaking gross sales from its rarest NFTs. On the prime of the checklist was Clone X #4594, which bought for 450 ETH in 2022. Clone X #13134 bought for 368 ETH. The remainder of the highest 10 most costly Clone X NFTs traded over $500,000 value of ETH.

By the point 2021 rolled round and the NFT craze had reached fever pitch, RTFKT grew to become such a giant hit that Nike acquired it earlier than the 12 months’s finish. The NFT studio continued to determine itself in 2021, promoting over $3.1 million value of its NFT sneakers. Moreover the well-known CloneX NFT assortment, RTFKT has since launched many NFT collections, together with the CryptoKicks NFT assortment.

Via its time within the Web3 limelight, RTFKT NFT Studios demonstrated a deep understanding of learn how to harness the ability of hype and leverage it into long-term success. Earlier than exiting the NFT market, the NFT studio RTFKT revamped $5 million from promoting non-fungible token collections and different crypto property. The long-lasting trend model ‘Nike’ closed down its NFT studio RTFKT on December 2, 2024.

pic.twitter.com/ySShPa0I7r

— RTFKT (@RTFKT) December 2, 2024

NFT Merchants Need Their Funds Again

Within the case “Cheema v Nike Inc, U.S. District Court docket, Jap District of New York, No. 25-02305,” the purchasers of Nike-themed non-fungible tokens and different cryptocurrency property sought unspecified damages of greater than $5 million for alleged violations of New York, California, Florida and Oregon shopper safety legal guidelines. Nonetheless, these NFT merchants have deeply regretted trusting Nike.

In a brief presser with Reuters, they stated they might by no means have purchased the NFTs on the costs they did, or in any respect, had they recognized the tokens had been unregistered securities, and that Nike would “trigger the rug to be pulled out from below them.” Within the meantime, Nike, primarily based in Beaverton, Oregon, has not responded to requests for remark. Phillip Kim, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, has additionally declined to remark.