Having Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) function the chair of the Home Judiciary Committee was at all times a dangerous proposition for Republicans. Jordan is extra well-known for his grandstanding in conservative media than any acumen or experience throughout the Home of Representatives.
Jordan’s most important qualification is that he’s endlessly loyal to Donald Trump and would by no means enable the Judiciary Committee to conduct any form of investigation into Trump or his administration.
Outdoors of Speaker Mike Johnson, there is no such thing as a greater poster boy for the rubber-stamp Republican Home majority than Jim Jordan.
PoliticusUSA won’t ever bend the knee. We’re 100% impartial. Assist us by changing into a subscriber.
Jordan’s objective for operating the Judiciary Committee is to abuse its energy to analyze those that tried to carry Donald Trump accountable for alleged crimes.
Whereas Republicans within the Home crammed their committees with leaders who could be loyal to Trump, Democrats crammed their positions with skilled investigators and legislators who know learn how to use oversight energy and navigate congressional hearings successfully.
Rep. Jamie Raskin is a type of Democrats. He’s an lawyer and constitutional scholar, and an individual who understands learn how to correctly and successfully use Home oversight.
When Jordan gave Raskin an enormous opening by making an attempt to analyze former Particular Counsel Jack Smith, the Maryland Democrat seized on it.
Jim Jordan needs Jack Smith to testify behind closed doorways. Smith needs to testify in public.
Raskin wrote a letter to Jordan urging him to permit Smith to testify earlier than the nation.
Rep. Raskin wrote:
Final week, I applauded your name for transparency about Particular Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into how President Trump knowingly retained a whole lot of extremely categorised data at his Mar-a-Lago membership after which defied subpoenas, obstructed regulation enforcement, actively hid proof, and lied about his persevering with retention of these data. I counseled you for apparently becoming a member of us in demanding the total launch of Mr. Smith’s report—paid for by American taxpayers—in addition to all accompanying data which the Division of Justice (DOJ) has been desperately concealing.
