TL;DR: Intel has discontinued its RS1 inventory cooler, which was bundled with the entry-level Pentium G7400 and Celeron G6900 processors. The RS1 won’t have a direct successor, as a substitute the prevailing Laminar Cooler RM1 will take over because the in-box cooler for these two CPUs.
The RM1 at the moment ships with the Intel 300 (sure, that is the total CPU identify…), which debuted final 12 months as the corporate’s newest entry-level dual-core CPU for shoppers. It is usually the inventory cooler for a lot of different locked Intel processors, starting from Twelfth-gen Core i3 fashions to 14th-gen Core i7 chips.
The RM1 and RS1 are related in design and are each rated for 65W. Nevertheless, the RS1 options an aluminum base, whereas the RM1 has a copper heatsink base, which improves warmth dissipation. Moreover, the RM1 features a rotating LED gentle strip, providing enhanced aesthetics.
Alongside the RM1, Intel additionally makes use of the Laminar RH1 inventory cooler, which is included with a number of high-end locked CPUs, such because the i9-14900, i9-14900F, i9-13900, i9-13900F, i9-12900, and i9-12900F. Just like the RM1, the RH1 is just not offered individually to shoppers or resellers.
The RH1 is essentially the most premium inventory cooler in Intel’s portfolio, that includes a copper warmth column as its core materials. Its heatsink fastener, which attaches to the equipped backplate, is product of chrome steel somewhat than plastic. Nevertheless, the heatsink fins, like these on the RM1 and RS1, are nonetheless product of aluminum.
Intel has not disclosed why it’s discontinuing the RS1, however one risk is that the RM1 gives superior cooling efficiency. One other extra possible clarification, nevertheless, is that producing a separate cooler for a number of low-margin, entry-level processors is mindless financially.
Both manner, the change is simply tutorial for people who find themselves planning to purchase the Pentium G7400 or Celeron G6900 sooner or later. The additional copper within the RM1 might assist with higher warmth switch in principle, however it’s unlikely to lead to a major distinction in real-world efficiency. The RS1 was ok to maintain the temps in verify for these processors, and the RM1 ought to ship comparable efficiency.
