What, precisely, does a Director of Cognitive Benefit do? It’s not a title most Individuals encounter, and it sits far exterior the acquainted contours of diplomacy, army power, or financial leverage. However as Chenoweth explains, the competition for affect now not stays neatly inside these lanes both.
His focus is commonly on the grey house – the place info, notion, tradition, and conduct collide, and the place adversaries like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea are working with staggering sources and strategic focus.
On this Cipher Transient dialog, Chenoweth breaks down how cognitive operations really work, why the U.S. has struggled to maintain tempo, and what it means to offer the President an “info choice” that’s not merely kinetic or financial.
He affords uncommon, candid perception into how know-how, AI, and social platforms—from TikTok to algorithmically pushed personas—are reshaping the battlespace quicker than policymakers can write doctrine.
Our dialog is a deep dive into one of many least understood – however maybe most consequential – fronts of recent nationwide safety. Our dialog has been frivolously edited for size and readability.
Shawn Chenoweth
Shawn Chenoweth is the Director of Cognitive Benefit on the US Nationwide Safety Council.
The Cipher Transient: How do you clarify the function of the director of Cognitive Benefit?
Chenoweth: While you take a look at conventional components of army energy, you in all probability consider the DIME assemble. It isn’t an ideal assemble, but it surely’s fairly good. DIME, is damaged down into Diplomatic, Info, Army and Financial, and it’s totally clear who owns the Diplomatic, Army, and Financial parts. However there hasn’t been, at the very least in a number of many years, instance of the place individuals have actually come to the president and the administration with an “I” choice, for Info. And it is a disgrace as a result of whenever you really take a look at the DIME assemble, you do not need to break it into range pipes. We should always consider it as a cell. Every of these components acts as a part of a functioning cell, and eradicating any of these components means you have got an imperfect or failing cell.
So, I used to be requested to assist put the “I” again in DIME in order that we are able to present extra choices and benefits throughout the opposite components of DIME to nationwide energy and supply the president with alternatives to perform the Administration’s goals that are not simply warheads on foreheads or threatening economics or expending political leverage. We are able to improve these issues, however we are able to additionally achieve benefits through the use of cognitive results by way of the data surroundings.
Kelly: Let’s set the stage a bit additional. When you have been to clarify to the common American what is occurring when it comes to cognitive warfare within the grey zone – the world the place battle happens beneath the extent of warfare – how would you describe it?
Chenoweth: I believe when you look by way of your army histories, philosophers, politicians, political science, it is all fairly clear. You possibly can pick the weather. All of them have one underlying thread, which is that political victory is the one which issues at its core. That is actually what we’re speaking about. Nothing’s modified. How human beings are related, how know-how is affected has definitely modified. However what we actually care about is what individuals do in the true world and the geophysical world, the world we stay in.
So, the purpose of a cognitive benefit is to leverage that in order that human beings are taking behaviors favorable to outcomes, to nationwide goals, which more often than not are additionally – within the case of america – favorable in their very own proper. So it is core. And that’s what we’re driving to get: these benefits in what individuals do in the true world by way of their sensing, to make choices that come again to the true world and have the consequences that you really want.
Kelly: Are you able to give an instance of what that may appear like?
Chenoweth: To illustrate you are negotiating for a chunk of land or a base that you just want for overflight intel assortment. You are going to conduct a trade-off in negotiations. Possibly it’ll appear like, – when you pay extra, you will get extra – based mostly off what the worth proposition is. However very not often is it that blatant and easy. So, what you need to have the ability to do is perceive, what benefit would we want within the negotiation? What’s really driving this different get together apart from perhaps simply value or simply hazard? What’s the chance calculus?
There are cultural nuances that have an effect on issues: their understanding of affect, political implications. So, the purpose could be to know why they’d have an interest on this within the first place? What benefit does it give them? What are the cultural nuances? Why would not they do that within the first place? Why aren’t they taking this motion and what can we do to guarantee that the result is what we would like?
There are different areas the place that applies throughout the spectrum.
To illustrate we’re conducting counter-terrorism operations, and we all know an goal tends to make use of a specific cafe. Effectively, what in the event that they have been utilizing a distinct one which day? What can we do to affect them to go to a spot that is extra favorable for choices to lower our personal danger calculus, both as a result of we need to conduct a kinetic strike or make an arrest? Possibly we won’t discover them. So, what if we use that for our intel assortment and our strategies to principally make them come up on comms and alter their conduct so it is simpler to search out them, gather on them, and construct the info in order that we are able to conduct bodily actions to cease or disrupt them? And you’ll type of see how that applies throughout the board.
If greater than the individual you are coping with, likelihood is that you’ll be higher at conducting your end result. It’s very related with the werewolf concept. It is a recreation the place two persons are chosen to be the werewolf of the village and everybody else within the group does not know who the werewolf is. More often than not the people who find themselves the werewolves win the sport as a result of they’ve an info benefit over everybody else enjoying the sport. So, it is a human norm.
And once more, I level out that nothing’s new beneath the solar. It is simply that we have not actually thought by way of the implications of what it means within the info age that we stay in – the place everyone seems to be related by way of software program outlined radios. We’re a great distance away from direct sensing the place it is communication and issues occurring in the true world. Now we now have form of oblique sensing the place you are fed knowledge feeds and the whole lot else. We are able to have an effect on cognitive conduct in methods we by no means imagined, and we actually have not thought by way of simply as we are able to attain individuals and promote objects. And if I need to discover an individual whose favourite coloration is purple, who’s a army age male who’s actually into Magnum PI, I can discover that individual due to their radio, and I can craft messages particularly for somebody who matches that demographic and transfer them in a specific course. That is the primary time in historical past that that is been the case.
Kelly: You’ve a background that mixes each authorities and personal sector expertise. On condition that know-how is being quickly developed within the non-public sector, how do you suppose that background provides you a bonus on this function?
Chenoweth: There are lots of people who’ve served within the army and have been contractors however simply by happenstance, I occur to have been in plenty of crucial places at crucial instances. I believe one of many benefits that has introduced me is that I noticed the frustration throughout the army when the contracting equipment did not work. I used to be additionally empowered by business to go and repair plenty of these constructions and allow the federal government to do it, and now I am getting afforded the chance to work on coverage to make the system actually hum.
I believe the benefit with that’s that relating to the data house, there is no management. And I attempt to emphasize this to any coverage maker or energy dealer or choice maker that I can discover. You possibly can put an armored brigade in an intersection – totally geared up, totally supported – and a U.S. Armored Brigade may personal that intersection. There are issues you may management. However relating to the data house, there isn’t any management. It’s always shifting, always altering. You’ve a binary choice. You’re both going to take part, ideally at a stage that issues, or not, and no matter’s going to occur goes to occur.
So, you can end up in an advantageous info house within the morning, lose it by the late morning, get a stalemate within the afternoon, and win it again within the afternoon – simply to lose it once more on the finish of the day. And whenever you get up the following morning, you are going to should do it another time. There isn’t any, “Now we have info dominance and we’re completed and we are able to crack our beers and go on with different issues.”
That is not how this works as a result of each day new info is being injected into the system. Individuals are altering and growing new opinions. Issues are occurring and persons are going to react to these issues, change their opinions, adapt, age out, age in, so these cultural references could change. It is a fixed flux. One of many issues that from the U.S. authorities aspect we’re getting our head round is that we want an info provider group always working afloat within the info surroundings, successfully. One which’s engaged 24/7 to have an effect on these adjustments.
The Cipher Transient is partnering with the Info Professionals Affiliation and the Nationwide Middle for Narrative Intelligence to carry you Pinnacle 2026: Grey Zone Convergence: Cognitive Safety on the Intersection of Affect, Innovation, and Shared Pursuits. Register for the February 9-10 convention now to safe your spot.
Kelly: It isn’t simply america that has gotten fairly good at understanding the affect of cognitive benefit. We see these techniques from China and Russia getting used with beautiful success. On this function, how centered are you on their actions relating to doing the very same factor that you just’re tasked with doing?
Chenoweth: They completely follow these actions. I name them the ‘CRINKETT’. Each problem we’re usually coping with falls within the CRINKETTS. It is China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Terrorists and Trans[national] criminals. And notably for the nation states, that is precisely how they need to compete.
From their perspective, there are two methods to cope with america: asymmetrically and stupidly, largely due to our financial and army energy. They get that. They don’t seem to be all for a kinetic combat; that’s an terrible prospect. So the way in which they need to do that is in grey zone actions, within the info house, within the cognitive area.
They usually outspend us. I am not going to say essentially outperform, however I will say if you wish to compete at a stage that issues, they outspend us, interval. Iran in all probability spends round $1.8 billion plus-minus a 12 months, perhaps extra with their proxies and the whole lot else they do on this specific house. Russia – put up Ukraine invasion, spends about $2.6 billion, one thing like that. China – 48 plus billion {dollars} a 12 months. The U.S., if I take all the actions from the DoD, the State Division and the whole lot else, and you place these collectively, you may method $1.2 billion.
It does not imply we’re executing these funds both. It simply signifies that that is what we have allotted. When you consider how we outspend to have a bonus on the opposite elements of DIME, we’re hideously underperforming right here. And once more, all props to the administration. They’re aware of this and the assist I’ve had on the Nationwide Safety Council and throughout the weather of presidency – the departments and companies – has been stellar. And we will proceed to work on this and get it proper as a result of we now have three and a half extra years of President Trump’s administration to get this proper, do the reps and units, and make this a sturdy coverage in order that the American individuals can begin having fun with these advantages that come once we’re actually centered on this house.
Kelly: What does success appear like for you on this function and the way do you measure it?
Chenoweth: Measurement has all the time been a humorous factor. Folks will always inform me how exhausting it’s to measure these actions. And what I’ve discovered time and time once more is that we’re really fairly good at these actions. The problems with the measurements are, once more, collaborating at a scale that issues. We have to measure conduct change, and with the intention to try this, we have to have clear goals. What are we after?
The massive a part of that’s who’s the target market that has the company to do the factor we would like? We spend plenty of time planning and CONOPS [Concept of Operations] on sub-target audiences that do not even have the company – in hopes that they have an effect on company – and that is completely nice. However why are we doing assessments in opposition to this? We spend plenty of money and time producing assessments to focus on audiences that do not have the company you need. So, let’s deal with the target market that has the company and let’s do that at scale.
For instance; I am within the DC space and I can go all the way down to the Potomac River, drop a bucket of water within the river, and I’ve objectively molecularly elevated the quantity of water within the Potomac. There is not a sensor on this planet that’s going to detect that molecular change.
The actual fact is that you just could be having an impact, however you do not have a sensor that’s going to choose that up. So, you could improve your scale or customise your sensing system to the impact you are having. That tends to be the place the assessments disintegrate.
I’ve heard on a regular basis for many years now that assessments are so exhausting. I do not discover that to be true. What I discover is that you’ve got sacrificed assessments for impact, which is ok. It is danger calculus. If I had a low quantity of sources and I made a decision to place as a lot into the impact I’ve needed, that is nice. However on the finish of the day, you are on the lookout for the true conduct change within the focused viewers that issues. What are the sensors you have got on that and what are you doing to gather that knowledge: public opinion, analysis surveys, constructing the networks. We will see this exacerbate additional because the AI revolution continues at tempo.
Kelly: How is know-how impacting what you are attempting to do, your mission, after which how are you additionally working with the non-public sector as a result of the non-public sector is controlling a lot of the know-how and the innovation that the federal government must work with. So how are you doing that?
Chenoweth: One of many challenges I see rising from AI is that there is form of an assumption that AI will repair all of your woes. I’ve seen the perfect instruments on the market do one factor: they mannequin the info they’ve, and that is the core concern. We do not have the info. So once more, I am again to there’s not an entire lot of recent issues beneath the solar. And the AI fashions are actually good, and it will probably mean you can discover new insights from the info that you’ve got, however new knowledge must be created. So, sacrificing assortment methodologies and new approaches to assemble the info on the foot of a mannequin is horrible.
The AI snake oil salesman I’d cope with in business on a regular basis would are available in and say, ‘Oh, you are all for that? I may completely mannequin you the factor.’ Cool. How does that work? ‘Effectively, all you must do is present me the info and we’ll put all this collectively and provide the insights.’ I am like, whoa. We do not have the info both. Nobody has the info. That is type of the issue. So, let’s be trustworthy about what we’re doing.
AI goes to be an ideal boon for business and for the federal government and everybody else beneath the solar. It should clearly have affect, however I believe as that strikes ahead, we have to begin taking a look at how we really make use of it. Constructing an agent or a token for each employee so that they are augmented by an AI that does the factor that they themselves might not be good at or saving them time goes to be superb, but it surely must be undergirded by with the ability to detect what’s really occurring out in the true world. And people two issues are usually not essentially – not interrelated. As I mentioned, most issues are form of an entire cell that function in a single unit, and we won’t essentially bifurcate these items after which count on good outcomes.
Former Senior CIA Government Dave Pitts wrote a three-part collection solely for The Cipher Transient on what the U.S. can do to turn out to be extra aggressive within the Grey Zone. Subscriber+Members can learn it right here. Want entry? We will help with that.
Kelly: So you have got a mission that’s troublesome to measure, is vastly impactful, adversaries are utilizing it as properly in opposition to Americans successfully, and in some instances, these adversaires are dedicating much more sources to this. When you may explaine to the common U.S. citizen how they could be focused by cognitive operations which are performed by U.S. adversaries, what would you inform them to search for?
Chenoweth: It is advisable be aware of sources clearly. After I take a look at the assemble of how we method cognitive warfare, I believe one of many largest issues I’ve had for at the very least the final 10 years has been the assemble of dis- and misinformation. My concern is not the dis- and misinformation assemble. It is the overuse of it.
Disinformation and misinformation are issues. They’ve which means. However they imply one thing that’s true and other people use it for issues that aren’t true. For instance, disinformation are lies. The individual projecting the data is aware of it is a lie. They’re doing it to perform an goal. The larger drawback of disinformation is misinformation. These are people who find themselves sharing these lies, not understanding they’re lies, or taking issues out of context like satire, et cetera, and propagating as if it have been reality. These are what these are.
However not the whole lot we now have to cope with falls into that assemble. There are two different parts to this that we now have to be aware of.
One is lacking info, which used to imply that the target market wasn’t knowledgeable sufficient to make an accurate choice, favorable to them or anybody else. ‘It is a tragedy that your member of the family died and you must mourn their loss, however cease touching the physique. That is the way you’re spreading Ebola’, proper? Fairly simple, fairly easy.
Now that we’re coping with nation states with deep pockets, that is been flipped up on its head and so they’re practising energetic lacking info, the place they are going to present wire providers into a rustic saying, ‘Congratulations, you should use our wire service without spending a dime and we’ll present you all of the stuff, and that is your largest value aside from labor. Is not that fantastic? The catch is that you just simply have to make use of our wire service’.
When you suppose [contextual] tales are going to get into the press by way of these channels, good luck. This is not occurring within the third world. These are occurring in main international locations and locations that may shock you.
Think about one thing like, ‘When you run this story, all our related companies which are related by way of us or different means are going to drag their promoting funds from you.’ So once more, good luck speaking concerning the story in your surroundings. Nobody’s going to the touch it. No influencer desires a chunk of it as a result of they’ll lose their incentive construction and their income stream. It is issues like that.
On the opposite aspect of the coin, and the larger drawback, is the rhetoric info. These are the issues that are not essentially true or false. They’re framed by your worth system, the way you view issues, what you suppose reality really is.
There are individuals on the market who will say, I believe a communist socialist type of authorities that’s extremely authoritarian is extra steady and subsequently higher than a liberal democracy. There are individuals who imagine that, and simply by saying, properly, historical past would show you in any other case, it is not a ok argument. It is advisable have interaction with these individuals at a scale that issues and be ready to win the argument.
We have seen this time once more on the counter-terrorism entrance the place we might shut down the comms of a no person, and instantly that individual would come again with the repute that was so worthwhile, and now they are a terrorist thought chief as a result of the Western world thought that they have been so harmful they wanted to be shut down as an alternative of simply accepting the actual fact, that perhaps we must always simply have interaction with this man as a result of nobody’s ever heard of him and perhaps we must always simply level out that he is a moron.
There are methods to cope with this, and simply because we do not like one thing does not imply it is a mislead the individual that’s spreading it. They may imagine it. Earlier than we simply title one thing disinformation and say, properly, it is a lie and we are able to ignore it — that’s not enough within the trendy period the place everyone seems to be related as a result of, once more, this individual has connective tissue to the web. They’ve net platforms. They are often simply as related as a authorities if they need to select to be and if they’ve the recognition, as a result of at its core, no matter whether or not or not you are a authorities or a star or anything, you’re combating for consideration.
Kelly: It’s typically troublesome for busy Individuals to navigate the data house at present and know what to imagine with out inviting some critical time into the supply. Do you take a look at a part of your mission on this function as serving to individuals perceive extra of the context they want with the intention to make good choices?
Chenoweth: I have been extra on the aspect coping with international audiences. However even in that regard, I believe that it actually issues to ask what are the issues that we all know to be what we really feel are goal truths and issues that matter? Issues that we would like goal audiences to know as a result of we all know it will be higher for them and higher for our goals?
After which what are the issues the place we simply need to guarantee that if a debate must be had, we facilitate the talk in order that the target market, notably with an American target market – which once more, it is not my forte, we do not try this in authorities or should not — that must be facilitated by Individuals mentioning to one another that we do must have these debates and are available to type of consensus, understanding that there will probably be disagreements.
Kelly: Do you suppose your job goes to be much more vital sooner or later or perhaps much less?
Chenoweth: I’ve by no means thought the job wasn’t vital. I believe the factor I am having fun with proper now’s that everybody’s type of getting their head round what this implies. The overused expression that ‘We have to do some issues on Fb,’ whenever you would have policymakers say, ‘Effectively, I am involved that that may destroy Amazon and web commerce’ and your head would explode as you are attempting to clarify, ‘That is simply not how the web works, man.’
We could be snug working on these platforms and doing issues that we have to do with out destroying web commerce or the web. And now I believe plenty of coverage makers and business are all related. They’re much more snug doing these items. Now’s the time when we have to get to the place the sources and the permissions actually match the flexibility to get us the place we have to be.
I’ve usually not discovered too many authority issues. I usually discover permissions issues. I discover that relating to authorities, you nearly all the time discover that each group really has a framework that permits them to do issues. It is simply that somebody someplace within the chain can say no and is all too snug saying no, as a result of, notably prior to now administration, they have been very snug at avoiding danger and never as snug at managing danger. And that may be a dynamic that we now have to vary. The world is a dangerous place, and we have to be on the market collaborating in it, throwing our elbows round and managing the chance, not avoiding it.
Kelly: How exhausting of a job is it to offer the U.S. the cognitive benefit in at present’s world?
Chenoweth: It is exhausting, tremendously exhausting since you’re speaking about altering tradition. I do not suppose the exercise itself and the coverage and the issues that may be completed are exhausting. I believe the exhausting half will probably be altering the tradition and altering individuals’s mindsets.
We have talked about the truth that there was three domains: bodily area, info area and cognitive area. Now we have to discover the data area and truly name it what it’s. There may be the bodily area, the geophysical area. However I just like the ‘kill net’ method. An excellent kill net will represent a kill chain that’s disrupted, and we now have to get out of only a kill chain. We have to get right into a kill net mentality relating to cognitive results.
Kelly: Clarify what you imply by a “kill net”?
Chenoweth: You’ve your geophysical world the place issues exist in the true world, the place the place all of us stay. With regards to the data area, although, it used to consolidate a bunch of issues.
The truth is that once we break that down right into a kill net, you are wanting out of your bodily area as much as your logic layer. The web shouldn’t be some amorphous cloud that wanders round. It is composed of a system of techniques that stay in the true world. It is knowledge facilities, servers, modems, et cetera. The place does that infrastructure really exist? Typically the information are within the laptop. So, we have to be aware of the place does that work? How does the web, how do these constructions work, the cell networks, et cetera.
From there, it then creates the digital layer, the place all of the trons are that exist. You possibly can have results, that is the place your actual our on-line world comes into play. That is how the cell gadgets work, however that’s simply knowledge.
Then it goes as much as the persona entity stage. These are the true human beings, typically faux human beings, they’re personas, organizations however entities that doubtlessly might be focused or addressed or engaged, et cetera.
After which there’s the cognitive house. The trick within the cognitive house is what occurs within the thoughts. And that thoughts is influenced by the sensing that goes up by way of that chain once they course of it. You are in a position to interdict on its approach up or affect, and also you’re in a position to affect on the way in which down when a call is made.
For instance, when one thing occurs in the true world, it is communicated to a call maker, however it’ll undergo the logic layer transmitted by way of sensors, computer systems, emails, telephones, et cetera, to individuals and entities who’re going to course of it themselves, talk it to a call maker who’s going to decide based mostly off that info, or a person or a bunch of people.
They’re all going to make choices on the way to react to that or not react to that. And that is going to return all the way down to the bodily world once they say, ‘I do not actually like what is occurring’, or perhaps ‘I do like what’s occurring. Let’s do the factor’. They are going to talk that all the way down to ‘Sure, launch the missiles’, or ‘Let’s have a protest’. So, you may have an effect on the chain up. You possibly can have an effect on the chain down, however that is the way it works.
We as america have a pipe that exists inside that kill net construction – so does everybody else. And it does not matter when you’re a nation state or a household or a person. You’ve your sensing sources.
As I discussed earlier, the direct conversations between individuals in the true world – even now, you and I are speaking utterly over that whole construction – and that construction might be affected on the way in which up as we’re speaking to when that is lastly produced and goes again out to the true world the place instantly I’ve AI results on me and I am saying issues I by no means meant to say, however the remainder of the world’s now deciphering that.
I did not say that, that wasn’t my cognitive choice, however you intercepted on the way in which down and now you’ll inadvertently have an effect on everybody else’s cognitive method to what I am speaking.
Kelly: What does the longer term from a know-how and AI standpoint actually appear like?
Chenoweth: It is having elementary adjustments. It should be attention-grabbing to see what occurs within the leisure business as AI takes over and instantly individuals can have extra entry. We have seen how the music business went by way of big change simply on streaming music. We’re about to witness what that is going to appear like from our extra conventional platforms. We have seen how issues transfer from streaming. I believe there’s a stage of adaptation that is going to go along with that.
One of many issues that must be addressed is how precisely we will have interaction. There’s a level the place we have to be snug with giving form of steerage to the AIs – human within the loop – however when you suppose that you are going to have the ability to assessment each single message that should exit in an AI-driven world, you are out of your thoughts.
So, you want to have the ability to be snug producing on your target market profiles and provides form of thematic steerage and let the AI do some stage of engagements in opposition to international audiences to steer conversations in a specific course, or at the very least determine the place a dialog could be going so you may intervene when it seems to be like choices are being made in a nasty approach, after which discover out if that’s an open and trustworthy cultural nuance factor the place it’s about engagement or if it is being steered by your opponent.
I believe that we aren’t far, and we’re in all probability already in a recreation, the place there are AIs versus AIs as we communicate within the info surroundings.
Learn extra expert-driven nationwide safety insights, perspective and evaluation in The Cipher Transient as a result of Nationwide Safety is Everybody’s Enterprise.
