In “Brooke Shields is Not Allowed to Get Outdated,” the actor writes about what a physician did to her, as she calls them, “woman elements” with out her consent. Well being reporter Sarah Varney tells NPR’s Ayesha Rasco that Shields shouldn’t be alone within the violation of her physique’s autonomy.
AYESHA RASCOE, HOST:
“Brooke Shields Is Not Allowed To Get Outdated” – that is the title of the actor’s new ebook. It is a reflection on getting old and company as a girl. In her ebook, Shields revealed that she had a surgical procedure on part of her physique that she refers to as woman elements. We’ll say that now to present a heads as much as listeners that we’ll be discussing sexual well being on this story. The actor, then in her 40s, went in for a gynecological process, and later the surgeon informed Shields that he threw in a bit bonus, tightening the vaginal space. Morning Version host Leila Fadel spoke with Shields. That interview will air on Monday’s program. Leila requested her why she did not complain or sue after the nonconsensual surgical procedure.
BROOKE SHIELDS: I believe I wasn’t robust sufficient. I did not really feel safe sufficient in my profession for it to but once more be about my anatomy, you understand?
RASCOE: We wished to speak to a reporter who covers girls’s well being and who has appeared into these undesirable procedures. Longtime NPR contributor Sarah Varney is right here with us at this time. Welcome.
SARAH VARNEY, BYLINE: Thanks, Ayesha.
RASCOE: Sarah, a surgeon performing a process that Shields did not comply with – it looks like an immense breach of her bodily autonomy. How do you make sense of what occurred to her?
VARNEY: You already know, as you simply heard her describe, she’s been speaking about it, and she or he mentioned it is actually exhausting for her to make sense of what occurred to her. You already know, she’s had this mixture of feelings – at first, shock and confusion, after which later anger. She really writes in her ebook that she did not even inform her husband immediately as a result of she wasn’t even certain what had really occurred to her and why.
I spoke with Cheryl O’Brien. She’s an affiliate professor at San Diego State College, and she or he research and publishes analysis on what’s referred to as obstetric violence. In order that’s violence perpetrated by medical professionals throughout prenatal care, labor and supply, and postnatal care. However she mentioned what Brooke Shields went by means of could be very comparable.
CHERYL O’BRIEN: He acted like he is an knowledgeable on what any girl would need carried out to their vagina to presumably please a person. And worst, he did what he wished to her with out consent. And ladies and ladies, particularly, have been topic to the policing of their our bodies by patriarchal forces inclusive of the medical neighborhood for a very long time.
RASCOE: O’Brien there says that this has been taking place for a very long time. Like, how far again does this go?
VARNEY: I imply, how a lot time do you could have (laughter)? Beginning within the Twenties, there was one thing that got here to be often known as a Mississippi appendectomy. These have been involuntary sterilizations to poor Black girls who have been deemed unfit to breed. The time period itself was really coined by Fannie Lou Hamer, a civil rights activist. Hamer had really gone in to have a tumor eliminated however as a substitute was sterilized. And the concept was that, you understand, a affected person was getting in for an appendectomy – that is the place the title got here from – and as a substitute had a hysterectomy. However these pressured sterilizations – they occurred for many years, you understand, up till the Nineteen Eighties.
RASCOE: Once we take a look at, like, what occurred to Brooke Shields, is that sexual assault?
VARNEY: Cheryl O’Brien, the researcher, says completely. She mentioned, you understand, if this was anybody else doing this to a girl, this is able to be sexual assault. However all as a result of this specific physician on the time, you understand, had the guise of a medical skilled, it does not imply that he is appearing in the most effective curiosity of the affected person. You already know, he was doing what he wished to her physique with out asking for her consent.
RASCOE: So what will be carried out in the event you assume this has occurred to you?
VARNEY: So, you understand, the troublesome half right here is that doctor self-discipline does depend on affected person complaints. So there are state medical boards and hospital oversight committees that may and do self-discipline physicians. They’ll take away their licenses, and, in some instances, they’ll refer instances for felony prosecution.
I spoke with Dr. Robert Steinbrook. He is a well being analysis group director at Public Citizen, a nonprofit shopper group. And Steinbrook has, for years, advocated for stopping harmful docs, for beefing up state medical boards, which might self-discipline physicians, revoke licenses. And he is targeted particularly on sexual misconduct by physicians.
ROBERT STEINBROOK: There is a energy dynamic distinction between physicians and sufferers most often. It is generally troublesome for a person to push again towards one thing that they assume is unsuitable or ask questions.
VARNEY: It truly is as much as sufferers to step ahead, even after they would possibly really feel annoyed or offended or embarrassed. Their stepping ahead can actually have an effect for themselves and for different sufferers.
RASCOE: Sarah Varney is a longtime well being reporter and a frequent contributor to NPR. Thanks a lot for becoming a member of us.
VARNEY: Thanks, Ayesha.
RASCOE: You may hear Brooke Shields’ full interview with NPR’s Leila Fadel tomorrow on Morning Version.
(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)
Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Go to our web site phrases of use and permissions pages at www.npr.org for additional data.
NPR transcripts are created on a rush deadline by an NPR contractor. This textual content will not be in its ultimate type and could also be up to date or revised sooner or later. Accuracy and availability could fluctuate. The authoritative document of NPR’s programming is the audio document.