How to seal an election in five steps through information power — RT World News

In response to Shakespeare’s well-known dictum, no legacy is so wealthy as honesty. But particularly throughout election intervals in present-day America, bestowing such a blessing of integrity on future generations doesn’t seem like a excessive precedence for a lot of political movers and shakers.

As an alternative, a number of influencers deal with shaping voting conduct by cunningly manipulating data, which constitutes a key lever of energy. Their good playbook for offering cowl towards allegations of election fraud consists of 5 motion factors, which I synthesize in my new paradigmatic mannequin, known as the “5-Rung Data-Energy Ladder” (see Determine 1). This blueprint can be utilized for reaching manipulative stardom and agenda-setting energy – the second supply of management in Steven Luke’s mannequin of the “three faces of energy.” The techniques distilled in my new mannequin rely closely on leveraging subtle rhetorical influencing techniques, together with numerous types of gaslighting (a manipulative approach aimed toward prompting one other individual to doubt his personal notion, for instance, via false narratives), by totally exploiting each biased and fallacious considering. 

Curiously, when evaluating and contrasting this template with American strategies of conducting psychological warfare in overseas nations – particularly with the interference within the election processes of perceived hostile regimes which can be to be overthrown in a “Colour Revolution” – the adoption of double requirements turns into obviously apparent, with such partial inconsistency crucially undermining the credibility of the self-styled “chief of the free world.”

Allow us to take a look at my aware-awakening framework, which can be utilized to detect manipulation, comparable to false narratives unfold within the data conflict, and create highly effective counterstrategies.

Determine 1: 5-Rung Data-Energy Ladder

1. Mentally vaccinate the audience 

In medication, efficient vaccines, on account of their immunizing results, function a protect when a pathogen assaults. Likewise, in an software of the traditional influencing tactic of anticipation (prolepsis), you possibly can paint a state of affairs of a state of affairs that bears the danger of being detrimental to your self and attribute its gestation to sure malefactors, thus priming your audience for its prevalence and forestalling the occasion or at the very least mitigating its adverse results, comparable to status injury.

For instance, a authorities could announce that its foes plan a heinous act of sabotage (comparable to blowing up a nuclear station in a conflict zone) and thus wish to provoke a desired response. If that is what the opponents really deliberate to do, the prolepsis would possibly immediate them to chorus from the act. Alternatively, if the occasion really happens, the recipients of the preliminary inoculating message, as a result of psychological priming impact, are prone to mechanically attribute it to the motion of the foes who had beforehand been known as out.

Within the 2024 US presidential election influencers leaning in direction of the Democratic Celebration, together with liberal mainstream media comparable to CNN and the BBC, alleged earlier than the election that the Republican Celebration devised an elaborate technique for claiming election fraud in case the vote counting confirmed that it had misplaced. The impact of such an anticipatory transfer is that if subsequently Republicans cry foul, the viewers, as a result of priming, is prone to discredit their claims of election fraud throughout the board in a wholesale method, not even particular proof, because it in all probability will categorize criticism of the election as a premeditated try at manipulation. 

In an additional refinement of the technique, the Machiavellians stress that false claims alleging election fraud began even earlier than the election. On this case, the mentally vaccinated viewers will react with boredom to recent fraud allegations after the allegations, considering to themselves: “Right here the Republicans go once more.” 

When the US interferes within the elections of different nations, it adopts a radically completely different method, although. There, preemption doesn’t consist in warning the general public towards claims of alleged election fraud however in foretelling precise election fraud to be dedicated by the incumbent authorities. As soon as opposition teams have misplaced an election, they’re routinely inspired to cry foul and reject the favored verdict even when they lack proof for his or her claims. All alongside, their grievances are broadcast to a worldwide viewers with the assistance of US media and finance energy.

2. Poison the ecosystem that points fraud allegations

The manipulative tactic and fallacy generally known as “poisoning the nicely” derives its title from the apply of actually placing poisonous substances into water sources to destroy an enemy’s power at supply. In rhetoric, the tactic entails discrediting the credibility of the very supply from which an undesirable argument springs earlier than the precise argument is made, in order that there isn’t any must cope with the opponent’s precise reasoning and proof in any respect. Moreover, abusive assaults advert hominem (on the individual) listed below are understood as makes an attempt made at discrediting opponents, too, however not by sowing doubts about their credibility beforehand, however by insulting their private traits in the midst of the precise debate. Circumstantial advert hominem assaults once more assault the individual, on this occasion specializing in his particular pursuits. In our case, the supply of knowledge is contaminated and its conveyors slandered in an ecosystemic vogue, crossing even nationwide boundaries.

To begin with, liberal mainstream media, such because the BBC, explicitly or implicitly convey the impression that allegations associated to election fraud are issued by deplorable, far-right and partisan people and teams with vested pursuits, supporting the Republican Celebration. Such media retailers additionally declare that these actors – who’re all lumped collectively into an “othered” outgroup – are utilizing “fringe message boards” and reside in an data bubble and echo chamber. As well as, they’re stated to be well-known for having lied earlier than, comparable to by spreading unfounded “conspiracy theories.” By the way, journalists who’re utilizing ill-defined labels comparable to most of the constructs talked about above are committing the fallacy of pointless vagueness.

The liberal data warriors even spotlight that the fraud-related data is “crowd-sourced” – examples being the operation of “True The Vote,” which collects proof of voting irregularities, and a message-board neighborhood arrange by the billionaire Elon Musk on X serving the identical goal. Within the given context, the reference to crowd sourcing carries the adverse undertone of deliberate collective makes an attempt at manipulation. In instances of extra aggressive slandering, the crowd-sourcing automobiles are described as rumor depositories containing imprecise, nameless and “dangerous” data, though the gathering of proof associated to election fraud is a laudable endeavor.

Fairly ingeniously, as a result of adverse preliminary framing of the informants, a liberal journalist could deem himself entitled to refuse listening to any subsequent protection from the slandered people and teams, since such rebuttals by the hamstrung libel sufferer, too, will be stated to emanate from an allegedly contaminated supply.

Importantly, the liberal influencers are adopting a holistic multi-method method. They aim the whole self-constructed data ecosystem, not solely discrediting the data sources themselves, but additionally placing out system-wide “crimson herrings,” a tactic used to divert consideration by directing deal with a side-issue. As occurred so typically up to now, liberal mainstream media within the US have been fast accountable Russia, too, for meddling within the US election, this time alleging that Russian brokers intentionally investigated and unfold allegations of voter fraud to destabilize America. Curiously, even this text, no matter its line of reasoning and the proof supplied – on account of its subject and writer, is perhaps framed as an try at undermining belief within the US electoral system and thus be rejected, even earlier than it has been learn! Like in lots of instances up to now, the accusers of Russia failed to supply any proof for his or her unique claims. Whereas pointing the finger at others, US data warriors aren’t apprehensive by the truth that the “chief of the free world” not solely actively interfered within the elections elsewhere, however on many events even was complicit in instigating the removing of rightful overseas leaders, such because the democratically elected president of Ukraine through the Maidan unrest.

It must be pressured that each poisoning the nicely, launching advert hominem assaults and placing out crimson herrings are thought-about fallacies in a debate. It doesn’t matter who says one thing, however what he says associated to the problem beneath scrutiny. Even somebody discovered to have lied regularly up to now could say the reality and assemble a legitimate argument on one other event (though a wholesome dose of skepticism would possibly at occasions be warranted when assessing the credibility of his testimony). An try to preclude debate altogether by attacking the individual somewhat than his argument goes towards the relevance criterion and is due to this fact not admissible. On this context, it’s fairly pure that election fraud allegations are usually issued by the affected occasion in a course of that varieties an integral a part of the democratic system of checks and balances. In a courtroom setting, you’ll additionally anticipate damning testimony towards the suspect being summoned by the prosecutor and the sufferer’s lawyer that from the defendant, who’s unlikely to be desirous to incriminate himself. Likewise, diverting consideration from the problem at hand is an indication of a faulty argument, because the tactic goals at hiding one’s argumentative weaknesses. 

Once more, it’s instructive to match and distinction the data techniques adopted by liberal media retailers within the US with their conduct elsewhere. After they declare that such voting irregularities occurred in overseas nations, the place they intend to vary the federal government, they routinely fail to say that the emitter is a partisan, financed by overseas powers (a “overseas agent” in US communicate). As an alternative, it’s stated that the allegations originate from impartial teams. In doing so, the liberal influencers additionally commit the fallacy of particular pleading, described because the inconsistency of making use of a unique, normally extra constructive requirements, to oneself or to the item one desires to painting in gentle, coupled with loaded language, all constituting an indication of partiality and unfairness. Whereas the informers within the US are denigrated as “warped peddlers of conspiracy theories” or lumped collectively as an amorphous “crowd” or “mob,” within the overseas case, they’re normally favorably known as “brave members of a vibrant civil society.” Furthermore, when liberal information retailers such because the BBC wish to spotlight challenges with respect to official election ends in sure overseas nations, they explicitly name on viewers and readers to submit proof confirming such election fraud – contrasting with the adverse framing of such crowd-sourced data within the US.

3. Frontally assault fraud allegations in ostensibly scientific method 

To impress their viewers, liberal influencers within the US typically attempt to cover themselves behind a smoke display screen of purported scientific objectivity in an try to distinction themselves to warped, science-denying conspiracy theorists. 

First, the data warriors attraction to authority, with a view to sway their audience – an method colloquially generally known as “title dropping.” Specifically, they’re referring to individuals or teams with an expert “halo” comparable to a “voting rights professional.” In case such an attraction serves the aim of changing a legitimate argument, such a apply constitutes a fallacy. If the authority is cited as a supply of proof, this tactic will be criticized if the informant is just not actually educated and goal. Within the above instance, the title of “voting rights professional” seems doubtful, since you’ll hardly discover a diploma course in voting rights, for instance. Probably, the title is self-styled as an impression-management approach. It must also be remembered {that a} balanced method requires the reference to completely different people or teams standing on completely different sides. Furthermore, liberal media retailers routinely dismiss vote fraud allegations by citing election officers, who’re additionally individuals in authority with a particular halo. But the officers’ assertions on the contrary and descriptions of the steps taken to safeguard the integrity of the election alone don’t make fraud allegations invalid.

As one other instance of hiding behind a veneer of scientific objectivity, the political influencers normally declare that they’re participating in intensive “fact-checking.” For instance, when analyzing Elon Musk’s declare of election manipulation, the BBC talked about that it tried to seek out the supply of some information utilized by the Tesla chief, however couldn’t discover it, implying that the billionaire’s declare is unsubstantiated and thus invalid. Nevertheless, this line of purpose commits the fallacy of an attraction to ignorance or an argument ex silentio (from silence). The argument will be spelled out as follows: Since there isn’t any proof contradicting the BBC’s declare that election fraud allegations are flawed, the BBC is correct. Worse, the problem associated to the alleged lack of proof is to some extent the results of the unprofessional conduct of the BBC journalist accountable for truth checking. As an alternative of looking for the particular information supply someplace on the Web, he ought to simply have first contacted the one who revealed the info and ask for his supply. For steadiness, it must be pressured, although, that it might have been useful if this particular person had indicated the supply himself. By the way, the BBC’s skinny veneer of objectivity is pierced by way of the expression “far-fetched declare,” because it incorporates a question-begging epithet, which, in round and tautological vogue, states what must be confirmed, that’s, that Musk’s claims are outlandish. When confronted with a big amount of alleged voting irregularities, the BBC claimed that their sheer quantity makes it nearly not possible to verify them. Any such give up is clearly an unscientific posture, because the giant amount of fraud allegations ought to at the very least elicit wholesome skepticism as to the integrity of the election and make the journalist curious to look at as many instances as attainable. Claiming that all such instances as an alternative of a sufficiently giant quantity have to be examined is an occasion of the fallacy of perfectionism, in addition to a simplified and bifurcated all-or-nothing method, which might make most scientific enterprise, which normally depends on sampling, not possible.

Oftentimes, liberal data warriors body their opponent’s views negatively and warp them, omit key contextual data and make copious use of innuendo, whereas deliberately leaving the apparent damning and twisted conclusions unstated to create an aura of objectivity and a method of “rationalizing,” which entails presenting sure causes as a canopy for one’s true, much less respectable motives. The tactic of representing the views of an opponent in a false technique to make it simpler to assault them, known as “straw man,” is deemed inadmissible by the requirements of sound reasoning. For instance of manipulative contextual framing and the usage of deceptive strategies as a surrogate for legitimate reasoning, Donald Trump’s completely cheap stance that he would settle for the outcomes of the 2024 US presidential vote if it resulted from a “truthful and authorized and good election” was portrayed as a pretext for refusing to concede defeat no matter the standard of the election.

On account of the fact-checking course of, liberal influencers routinely claiming that somebody alleging election fraud succumbed to denialism and made his assertion “with out proof.” It needs to be famous that the phrase “denial” implies {that a} reality has been rejected. With out additional proof supplied for the allegedly true model, such a phrase is an indication of a faulty argument. The allegations are additionally typically known as “baseless,” “unfounded” and “debunked.” On this context, derogatory phrases such a “rumor,” “deceptive allegations” and “lies” are regularly used. For instance, the expression “with out proof” is repeated like a veritable mantra when liberal informational warriors touch upon claims that the 2020 US presidential election was stolen. As proof, they stress that courtroom instances alleging election fraud have been dismissed. Nevertheless, in so doing they commit the fallacy of omitting key information that can be utilized as counter proof, leaving the viewers with the impression that every one key information have been introduced. By failing to say the opponent’s strongest factors, they have interaction in lopsided considering and violate the rebuttal precept, which entails marshalling the strongest counter arguments in a fictious cross-examination and refuting them – a favourite apply perfected by the main medieval Scholastic thinker Thomas Aquinas. As regards this rejection of issues from an opponent’s perspective and the concomitant desire for an echo chamber populated by like-minded individuals as an alternative, we’re reminded of Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche’s dictum revealed in his ebook Morgenröte (Daybreak of Day) that “the surest technique to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to carry in larger esteem those that suppose alike than those that suppose in another way.”

In our case, liberal influencers within the US normally don’t point out that in lots of instances, after sure varieties of election fraud have been dedicated, it’s not possible subsequently to detect it. On this regard, the widespread use of postal voting is a selected trigger for concern, because it opens the floodgates for fraud, whereby pretend poll papers are produced, distributed and tampered. This isn’t a far-fetched declare. 

The German constitutional courtroom rule that the 2021 federal parliament election wanted to be partially repeated in Berlin due to voting irregularities comparable to election officers photocopying poll paper. Worse, the a number of transgressions have been deemed by the judges to be simply the “tip of the iceberg.” Within the German case, the photocopies have been used for in-person voting, however one can simply think about producing and distributing such pretend ballots for mail-in voting, too. Moreover, within the case of postal voting, in lots of instances it’s simpler to rig votes than on the poll field. For instance, nurses would possibly be capable to simply change the ballots of a helpless affected person within the hospital or discard them altogether. In such instances, recounting the votes within the context of a authorized trial is not going to reveal the fraud. As well as, within the case of postal voting, undue affect will be exerted on voters. Clearly, when husband and spouse are sitting on the kitchen desk and the spouse is coerced by the husband to vote in a sure approach towards her will, the results of the vote can’t be thought-about to be truthful.

As one other instance of ostensibly scientific objectivity, liberal data warriors are likely to regularly discuss with surveys as proof. But they typically don’t point out their respective pattern measurement and the sampling process (which, if unscientific, would possibly render the outcomes invalid), the kind of questions requested (the framing of questions will help to elicit desired responses) and confidence intervals for all of the statistics introduced. Moreover, the liberal influencers typically use excessive and vivid examples, that are outliers and marginal instances, in an try to show their factors.

An instance is a pretend put up on X by somebody who calls himself a Canadian and claims that he desires to participate within the US election (which is illegitimate), holding a poll from Florida (a couple of day’s drive from Canada) in his fingers. By the way, when analyzing such fakes, one should all the time take into account the chance that they’ve been planted by the very group who subsequently assault them – much like the tactic of inserting a violent provocateur right into a crowd of demonstrators to subsequently discredit the protest as a result of ensuing violence.

Even when the liberal influencers acknowledge that the vivid instances of election fraud are true, they attempt to neutralize their impact by claiming that these so-called “incidents” are remoted, frequent in all elections and blown out of proportion by extremists attempting to “punch holes” with anecdotes – the everyday trivializing “dangerous apple technique.” This line or reasoning normally resonates very nicely, particularly when one considers that there have been 150 million voters within the 2020 US presidential election, in comparison with which these “remoted” instances seem like marginal. Nevertheless, this sort of framing entails the usage of a flawed comparative anchor, since presidential elections in America are usually determined in a number of swing states the place voting conduct is regularly altering. Particularly within the 2024 election the place pre-election polls basically confirmed a tie, the variety of votes that may tip the steadiness was projected to be even smaller than common, and a few commentators believed that solely about 50,000 votes would make the distinction. On this context, utilizing 150 million as a comparative body is a gross distortion, whereas the potential reference to much less aggressive earlier elections would represent a false analogy. Moreover, when counting on samples which can be too small and unrepresentative and on outliers, the liberal influencers who problem election fraud claims commit the fallacy of constructing hasty generalizations, leaping to conclusions that aren’t warranted given the scarce proof.

The double requirements utilized by US liberals turn into obviously apparent when one considers their uncritical protection of favored election critics in sure different nations, who, as a result of protecting umbrella supplied by the “chief of the free world,” typically don’t even attempt at the very least to seem like scientific when difficult election outcomes. Within the 2024 parliamentary elections in Georgia, a former member state of the Soviet Union, President Salome Zurabishvili claimed that the election outcomes have been the result of a “‘Russian particular operation’” and that the election had been rigged. When requested for proof of Russian interference, she made the next callous assertion: “We don’t have arduous proof, however the apparent hyperlinks that the ruling occasion maintains with Moscow have been confirmed by quite a few studies.” When an official investigation into the allegation of election fraud was launched and the prosecutor summoned her, she outrightly refused to present testimony. Polish President Andrzej Duda commented on alleged Russian interference in Georgia as follows: “There is no such thing as a clear proof of this, however, let’s say, in some sense (pro-Russian forces have been concerned).” In contrast to the state of affairs within the US the place election fraud allegations have been dismissed on account of alleged lack of proof (though such proof was supplied), in Georgia, key actors even didn’t discover it crucial to supply any proof for his or her claims, however nonetheless weren’t criticized by the US liberal mainstream media for his or her unscientific method.

4. Vividly paint the results of utmost allegations

Intelligent liberal data warriors go one step additional, although. After having introduced their pseudo-scientific analyses, they leap to the conclusion that claims of election fraud, broadcast in an “ecosystem of mistrust,” will gas extremist riots by home terrorists (elsewhere such alleged riots are labeled as reputable protests and the “delivery pangs” of democracy), undermine belief in democracy and finally completely destroy the American political system, which is portrayed as essentially the most secure system of presidency on the earth. 

Logicians name this sort of manipulation the domino fallacy or slippery slope. The concept is that one occasion inevitably will unleash a sequence of subsequent occasions or that taking one step will trigger one to glide down a slope. The implications will be in comparison with the outcomes portrayed within the well-known domino impact described by Benjamin Franklin, who mused that for need of however a single horse-shoe nail, a complete kingdom was misplaced.

Amongst different issues, this tactic has been used efficiently within the psychological warfare towards Russia within the hybrid battle in Ukraine to justify intensive navy assist (euphemistically known as “safety support”) for the Kiev-based authorities by self-appointed Western allies particularly after the beginning of Russia’s particular navy operation. Specifically, the Western conflict hawks argued that the motion taken by Russia is simply the skinny fringe of the wedge and, if left unchecked, it is going to subsequently assault different nations, too, such because the Baltic states, leading to a world conflict performed with nuclear weapons that can finally destroy the planet. The identical propaganda trick was used to nice impact within the US to justify the Vietnam conflict.

The domino fallacy is inadmissible in a debate, although, since in response to the definition of this tactic, it attracts far-fetched conclusions based mostly on imagined causal hyperlinks, though the person causal steps are completely different and due to this fact would have to be analyzed individually to achieve a legitimate conclusion. Within the above case, for instance, there’s a vital distinction between launching a navy operation towards a rustic that isn’t a part of a navy block as in comparison with a member of NATO. Even when such an assault have been to occur, it might not mechanically result in the destruction of the earth. 

The conclusion that allegations of election fraud within the US can endanger the whole political system must be rejected, because the particular person causal steps are completely different, however not analyzed individually. Furthermore, the argument dangers being reductionist, attributing an end result to a single issue, whereas counting on an unique trigger that seems to be too far faraway from the ultimate predicted end result within the causal chain of occasions. In distinction, a greater argument can be to claim that an lively society attempting to uncover election fraud will really strengthen a democratic system, because it helps to get rid of dangerous conduct. Or would the liberal data warrior counsel that’s higher to not uncover election fraud?

The vivid portrayal of the alleged dire penalties of showing voting irregularities additionally depends on one other fallacy, that’s, the attraction to feelings, particularly worry. The intention of this tactic is to “play to the gallery,” clouding the uncritical viewers’s slipshod considering by pushing its buttons to set off highly effective passions, for instance. Since such appeals “advert populum” (to the individuals) don’t depend on legitimate reasoning, this fallacy once more is inadmissible in a debate. Utilized to our case, the worry of a breakdown of the US political system and ensuing chaos is certain to be a extremely unsettling prospect for a lot of law-abiding Americans. Concern related to predicted dire penalties is additional stoked by emotionally laden metaphors such a “whirlwind,” “flood” and “deluge” of disinformation, since all these pure phenomena are likely to wreak havoc on communities. Moreover, reference to the Capitol protests on January 6, 2021, and election officers receiving loss of life threats from Trump supporters are certain to instill the viewers with even better worry.

Once more, the comparability with the conduct of US data warrior in sure different nations is enlightening. There, opposition teams are routinely inspired to problem election outcomes and topple the federal government with no mentioning of the dire penalties which can be certain to ensue. In a comparable context, the removing of the federal government in Kiev after the Maidan unrest predictably accelerated a collision course with Russia.

5. Seal the protecting protect

What do the liberal data warriors do when, after climbing the 4 rungs of the data energy ladder, rebuttals with new proof are made by their opponents, forcing the propagandists to confess that the recent election fraud allegations are convincing on a prima facie stage or worse, that election fraud has really occurred and confirmed past doubt? There is no such thing as a purpose for the influencers to fret – in spite of everything, sophists, since historic occasions, have mastered the artwork of rhetorically reworking a black cat right into a white feline.

Friedrich Nietzsche is quoted as saying that “those that disagree with me once I say that mankind is corrupt show that they’re already corrupted.” The crowning apply of the sophistic commerce and “nuclear possibility,” a veritable panacea for victory in debates with uncritical opponents unschooled within the artwork of eristic dialectics, is the usage of self-sealing arguments. These are claims which can be not possible to refute, since each try at rebuttal is taken as “proof” for the reality of the unique declare. Aside from the quote firstly of this paragraph, illustration is the same old reasoning utilized by conspiracy theorists. For instance, if you happen to declare that an undefined deep state controls a rustic, any disconfirming proof will be framed as an try by its shady actors to safe their survival and success.

Utilized to our case, on the fundamental stage, a liberal influencer can painting Republicans who level to election fraud as unsophisticated and dumb after which interpret any of their subsequent rebuttals of his assaults as additional indicators of their restricted cognitive schools. Furthermore, the data warriors can construct on their preliminary framing of Republicans as conspiracy theorists and classify recent proof of election fraud as additional proof of their being warped in conspiracy theories. One of the highly effective makes use of of sealing arguments is much more subtle, although.

When election fraud has really been confirmed past doubt, you need to transfer to the next, systemic stage. Extra particularly, the liberal influencers can declare that the detection of fraud really confirms the soundness of the electoral course of, because it successfully picked up a manipulation case. In Orwellian Newspeak, which promotes Doublethink (whereby two contradictory statements are deemed to be each true, though that is logically not possible), fraud is honesty and integrity in the identical approach that conflict is peace, freedom is slavery and ignorance is power.

Clearly, the argument associated to the soundness of the method is flawed, since it’s unknown what number of fraud instances have not been detected. Particularly in view of the “tip of the iceberg” idea utilized by the German constitutional courtroom within the case of the 2021 federal parliamentary elections within the nation of the poets and thinkers, there is perhaps considerably extra fraud instances, which on the given level of time are nonetheless invisible.

Furthermore, the data warriors who use this self-sealing line of reasoning threat committing the fallacy of the continuum, ignoring the truth that small adjustments in a single path can finally result in the crossing of a tipping level after which qualitative transformation happens. It’s troublesome to find out precisely when exactly it its right to claim {that a} man has a beard versus not having one, however after including sufficient single hairs, every of which appears to be insignificant, individuals will lastly concur that there’s a beard.

Utilized to our case, we’d say that if there’s a ample variety of confirmed election fraud instances, every of which could seem like insignificant if thought-about in isolation, finally an inflection level will likely be reached. At this important juncture, one has to conclude that the whole electoral organism is sick, amongst different issues, as a result of it failed to stop mass-scale manipulation, presumably on account of inherent structural design faults. On the very least, even when the system have been basically sound, a ample variety of instances would immediate a courtroom to declare an election invalid and order a recent election as occurred in Berlin.

The road of reasoning associated to the integrity of the electoral system can be seen for instance of the fallacy of begging the query or circularity, because it might be restated within the type of the next “vicious” argument: The election system is truthful. How do we all know? As a result of instances of manipulation are detected accurately. How do we all know all such instances are detected accurately? As a result of the election system is truthful.

Allow us to as soon as once more examine the above state of affairs with the conduct of US consultants in psychological warfare in different nations, the place they intention for so-called regime change. There, all makes an attempt made to dispel doubts concerning the validity of an election based mostly on sound proof are used as additional proof of the purported manipulative nature of a rogue regime that in response to the story line is more and more “authoritarian” and “repressive.”

***

To conclude, the simplest approach of constructing a magician powerless is to uncover and disclose his tips. My 5-Rung Data Energy Ladder can function a consciousness-raising guidelines to systematically reveal flawed claims aiming at sealing an election, which is perhaps stolen, and to plot highly effective methods to counter such manipulative interventions. If the brand new paradigm is used systematically along with different instruments selling important considering, we’d lastly attain a stage of enlightened democracy. Then, when trying on the finish outcomes, we could exclaim with Shakespeare that every one is nicely that ends nicely, even – to intentionally use the fallacy of equivocation – if anyone persistently tried to poison the nicely!