SAUDI Arabia’s megalomaniac NEOM was hailed as a daring imaginative and prescient for the longer term however its “unrealistic” plans could also be crashing down amid a sea of controversies, an professional has stated.
The megacity – costing the Kingdom trillions – guarantees to remodel the nation’s economic system, cut back its reliance on oil, and place it as a worldwide powerhouse in innovation.
15
15
15
15
The key growth hopes to turn into an emblem of Saudi Arabia’s determined aspirations underneath Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s Imaginative and prescient 2030.
By means of huge investments, the nation revealed its 15 wildly bold initiatives funded by oil billions at an unprecedented price.
Touting with expertise that’s but to be invented, the Kingdom goals to construct the world’s tallest skyscrapers, futuristic cities and even a faux moon.
However NEOM’s gentle appears to be dimming.
Learn extra on Saudi Arabia NEOM
Not solely has its flagship venture drastically scaled again, however NEOM has been overshadowed by a collection of controversies that raised critical questions on its feasibility and moral foundations.
And because the clock ticks nearer to the tip of the last decade, it appears that evidently Saudi Arabia may not turn into the Center East’s futuristic powerhouse anytime quickly.
Dr Frederic Schneider, an impartial guide on post-oil financial transitions within the Gulf area, informed The Solar that Imaginative and prescient 2030 and NEOM had been seen as overly bold and practically not possible to realize from the very begin.
He stated: “When Imaginative and prescient 2030 was first introduced there was a number of discuss that it was massively bold.
“Many individuals from the beginning stated, ‘okay, this isn’t solely bold, that is nearly not possible’.”
A GAMBLE OF TRILLIONS
Dr Schneider famous that many of those grand initiatives, together with NEOM and “The Line,” face vital challenges, significantly when it comes to funding and precise implementation.
Even for Saudi Arabia, the prices are overwhelming with The Line predicted to be costing The Kingdon £2 trillion.
He stated: “The road, for instance, was budgeted for 500 billion. Estimates go up fourfold that price in case you are sensible. So that may be 2 trillion for the road alone.”
As one of the crucial costly growth initiatives in historical past, NEOM represents a colossal monetary gamble for Saudi Arabia.
This monetary burden is compounded by the issue in attracting overseas investments, as potential traders are cautious of unsure returns.
The financial dangers are compounded by international uncertainties and shifting financial tendencies that might undermine NEOM’s long-term sustainability.
If the venture fails to dwell as much as its lofty objectives, it dangers changing into a pricey white elephant — a futuristic ghost metropolis within the desert.
It comes as NEOM’s main flagship venture has been dramatically diminished.
END OF THE LINE
The Line was set to be residence to 1.5 million residents by 2030 – however will now home 300,000 and never even attain two miles.
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud’s £1trillion metropolis within the desert was promised to be a “civilisational revolution”.
It was the crown jewel within the Saudi authorities’s Imaginative and prescient 2030 – a program launched to extend diversification economically, socially, and culturally, consistent with the Crown Prince’s imaginative and prescient.
However the giga-project touted as transferring Saudi Arabia’s economic system away from its reliance on oil might not proceed as anticipated, in response to new reviews seen by The Telegraph.
Regardless of plans for the mirrored metropolis to increase 106 miles and home 1.5 million residents by the tip of the last decade, it’s now wanting extra probably that it’s going to stretch a mere 1.6 miles and home solely 300,000 individuals by 2030.
That is a stunning 1 per cent of its preliminary dimensions.
The “unsurprising” scale-down is claimed by specialists to replicate the Saudi authorities’s struggles to win over overseas traders, in addition to the nation’s vulnerability to grease costs.
Dr Schneider informed The Solar: “I used to be stunned that it took them so lengthy to announce these scale backs.”
The professional added that the Gulf area, together with Saudi Arabia, has a historical past of saying grand initiatives that both fail to materialise or are drastically scaled again.
Dr Schneider referenced earlier initiatives like King Abdullah’s Financial Metropolis and varied initiatives in different Gulf international locations that by no means reached their bold objectives – typically ending in failure or considerably diminished scope.
15
15
15
15
He stated: “There are plans in Kuwait – Medinat al Harir – that additionally by no means materialized. And all of those are very related in type to NEOM.”
The repeated failure to ship on such grand guarantees, mixed with previous incidents just like the Ritz-Carlton arrests in 2017, has eroded investor confidence.
That is significantly problematic for NEOM, the place the dangers are excessive and the returns are unsure, Dr Schneider stated.
The guide went on to say that Saudi Arabia is perhaps higher off specializing in extra sensible and sustainable growth inside present cities, like Riyadh, which is already progressing effectively.
I used to be really stunned that it took them so lengthy to announce these scale backs.
Dr Frederic Schneider
The pursuit of those “white elephant” initiatives, he stated, displays a need for the Crown Prince to go away a long-lasting legacy, however they might in the end show to be economically and politically pricey.
Dr Schneider defined: “As an alternative of following this pipe dream, why do not we construct on present cities and present benefits?
“They [Saudis] will attempt to not pay something to chop down on the prices whereas publicly happening with it, however they need to in all probability minimize their losses proper now, proper right here and go along with extra conventional developments.”
‘BUILT ON BLOOD’
Beneath NEOM’s glitzy facade lies a narrative of threats, compelled evictions and bloodshed that solid a darkish shadow over Saudi’s self-importance venture.
Many developments have confronted fierce criticism over human rights abuses, the place tribes had been shoved out of their homeland, imprisoned or executed.
At the very least 20,000 members of the Huwaitat tribe face eviction, with no details about the place they may dwell sooner or later.
For hundreds of years, this indigenous neighborhood lived within the space designated for NEOM’s development.
However what adopted was a harsh crackdown on those that resisted leaving their houses.
Probably the most tragic incident concerned the killing of Abdul Rahim al-Howeiti, a outstanding tribal chief who opposed the compelled removals.
His demise by the hands of Saudi safety forces in 2020 grew to become a stark image of the lengths to which the dominion was prepared to go to push the venture ahead.
One campaigner claimed “Neom is constructed on Saudi blood”.
Authorities within the port metropolis of Jeddah additionally demolished many homes to implement Saudi’s growth plans – with hundreds of locals evicted illegally.
Nader Hijazi – who determined to stay nameless – grew up in Aziziyah, one in all round 63 communities devastated by the demolitions.
His father’s home was demolished in 2021, and he obtained lower than a month’s discover.
High 5 blunders plaguing Neom venture
by Juliana Cruz Lima, Overseas Information Reporter
Saudi Arabia’s NEOM venture, regardless of its bold imaginative and prescient, has been criticized for a number of main blunders which have raised considerations about its feasibility, ethics, and total execution.
Listed here are the highest 5 main blunders related to the venture:
Pressured Displacement of Indigenous Communities: One of the crucial vital controversies surrounding NEOM is the compelled displacement of the Huwaitat tribe.
This indigenous neighborhood, which has lived within the space for hundreds of years, was forcibly faraway from their ancestral lands to make means for the event of the mega-city.
The Saudi authorities’s crackdown on those that resisted, together with the killing of a tribal chief, Abdul Rahim al-Howeiti, has drawn widespread condemnation from human rights organisations.
This blunder not solely sparked worldwide outrage but additionally tainted NEOM’s picture as a forward-thinking, humane venture.
Environmental Influence and Sustainability Considerations: NEOM has been marketed as an environmentally sustainable metropolis, however the environmental influence of such a large growth is a serious concern.
The venture’s scale—protecting over 26,500 sq. kilometers—poses vital dangers to native ecosystems, significantly within the Purple Sea, which is residence to wealthy marine biodiversity.
Critics argue that the development of synthetic islands and intensive urbanisation might result in irreversible ecological injury.
The big water and power calls for required to keep up a inexperienced metropolis within the desert additionally increase questions in regards to the venture’s sustainability.
Financial Viability and Value Overruns: NEOM is likely one of the costliest growth initiatives in historical past.
However there are critical doubts about its financial viability. Critics query whether or not the venture can appeal to the mandatory overseas funding and whether or not it’s going to generate adequate returns to justify the big expenditure.
The financial dangers are additional compounded by potential price overruns and delays, that are widespread in megaprojects of this scale.
This monetary gamble has led some to fret that NEOM might turn into a pricey white elephant if it fails to satisfy its bold objectives.
Technological Overreach and Moral Considerations: NEOM is envisioned as a high-tech metropolis, closely reliant on synthetic intelligence, robotics, and intensive surveillance methods.
Whereas this technological ambition is central to NEOM’s identification, it additionally raises vital moral considerations. The extent of surveillance deliberate for town might result in unprecedented management over residents’ lives, sparking fears about privateness and civil liberties.
The dearth of transparency about how AI can be used, coupled with considerations about job displacement, has additionally led to criticism that NEOM’s technological imaginative and prescient could also be extra dystopian than utopian.
Cultural and Social Disconnect: NEOM’s imaginative and prescient of a futuristic, liberalized society clashes sharply with Saudi Arabia’s deeply conservative cultural norms.
The venture plans to introduce mixed-gender sports activities, leisure occasions, and different liberal way of life components which can be uncommon within the kingdom.
This cultural shift has raised considerations a couple of potential conflict between NEOM’s globalised imaginative and prescient and the normal values of Saudi society.
The disconnect between the venture’s ambitions and the broader cultural context has led to skepticism about whether or not NEOM can actually combine into Saudi Arabia’s social material with out inflicting vital friction.
Hijazi stated the pictures he noticed of his earlier neighbourhood had been horrible, resembling a warzone.
He informed the BBC: “They’re waging a struggle on individuals, a struggle on our identities.”
Jeed Basyouni, Center East director of the human rights organisation Reprieve, informed DW: “Now we have seen, again and again, that anybody who disagrees with the crown prince, or will get in his means, dangers being sentenced to jail or to demise.”
In Could, an ex-intelligence officer revealed how Saudi authorities allowed the usage of deadly pressure to clear land for The Line.
Col Rabih Alenezi informed the BBC he was given the order to drive out residents of a tribe within the Gulf state in order that NEOM’s flagship venture may very well be constructed.
After that, one in all them was shot and murdered for protesting in opposition to eviction.
He stated the April 2020 order said the Huwaitat was made up of “many rebels” and “whoever continues to withstand [eviction] must be killed, so it licensed the usage of deadly pressure in opposition to whoever stayed of their residence”.
Each the Neom administration and the Saudi authorities declined to remark to the BBC.
CULTURAL CLASHES & WORK TENSIONS
NEOM’s imaginative and prescient of a futuristic, liberalised society contrasts sharply with Saudi Arabia’s deeply conservative cultural norms.
The venture plans to introduce mixed-gender sports activities, leisure occasions, and different liberal way of life components which can be uncommon within the kingdom.
However this cultural shift has sparked considerations a couple of potential conflict between the venture’s globalised imaginative and prescient and the normal values of Saudi society.
There are additionally ongoing worries in regards to the therapy of labourers concerned in NEOM’s development, significantly the migrant staff who make up a good portion of the workforce.
Due to Saudi Arabia’s murky previous with regard to labour rights, there are considerations that the employees establishing NEOM could also be subjected to mistreatment and unfavourable working circumstances.
‘MISSING WORKERS’
There are critical allegations {that a} vital variety of migrant staff employed within the development of Saudi Arabia’s NEOM venture might have disappeared or stay unaccounted for.
This problem is a part of a broader concern about labor rights and the therapy of migrant staff within the Gulf area, significantly inside large-scale development initiatives like NEOM.
Saudi Arabia, like many different Gulf international locations, closely depends on migrant labour for its bold development endeavours.
These staff, typically from South Asia, Africa, and different creating areas, are usually employed underneath the Kafala system—a sponsorship system broadly criticised for creating circumstances akin to modern-day slavery.
Beneath this technique, staff are tied to their employers, who maintain vital management over their actions, their means to alter jobs, and even once they can return to their residence international locations.
Studies have emerged alleging that as many as 100,000 migrant staff have gone lacking through the development of NEOM.
15
15
15
These staff are believed to have endured harsh working circumstances, lengthy hours, and insufficient residing lodging.
Some accounts counsel that these staff had been both deported with out correct documentation, deserted with out help, or, within the worst circumstances, died as a result of poor working circumstances and an absence of enough medical care.
Human rights organisations have been vocal in regards to the potential abuses linked to NEOM and different main initiatives in Saudi Arabia, calling for higher transparency and improved safety of staff’ rights.
However because of the tight management the Saudi authorities maintains over data and the motion of individuals inside the nation, these organisations face vital obstacles in confirming the extent of the reported abuses.
[The Saudis] ought to in all probability minimize their losses proper now, proper right here and go along with extra conventional developments
Dr Frederic Schneider
The Saudi authorities has typically denied or downplayed allegations of widespread employee mistreatment, pointing to reforms it has made to the Kafala system and its Imaginative and prescient 2030 plan, which incorporates efforts to enhance labour rights.
The displacement of native populations and potential employee abuses, Dr Schneider added, might additional injury Saudi Arabia’s fame and deter traders.
He stated: “Buyers will see that in all probability there is a huge threat they’ve to connect to that venture.”
TECHNOLOGY & ETHICAL DILEMMAS
NEOM is designed to be a technological marvel, with intensive use of synthetic intelligence, robotics, and surveillance methods.
However this high-tech imaginative and prescient raises vital moral questions.
Critics warn that the extent of surveillance deliberate for NEOM might result in unprecedented management over residents’ lives, elevating critical considerations about privateness and civil liberties in such a managed setting.
The venture’s reliance on AI additionally brings up points associated to job displacement and the moral use of expertise.
With little transparency about how these applied sciences can be carried out, there are rising fears about their potential misuse.
The venture additionally typically boasts expertise that has but to be invented.
A former worker beforehand described The Line as “untethered to actuality”.
A Bloomberg investigation from 2022, which interviewed 25 personnel and reviewed 2,700 pages of inner papers, noticed the venture be beset by setbacks and delays.
Final yr, architect and concrete planner Etienne Bou-Abdo stated the 3D visuals offered “should not classical 3D structure pictures”, and the venture designers “have slightly referred to as upon online game designers”.
He claimed that the plan incorporates “a number of expertise that we do not have as we speak.”
Lots of The Line’s important components, notably these linked to power and transportation, are predicated on expertise that don’t but exist, even in prototype.
Since its inception, the Crown Prince’s imaginative and prescient for the venture has modified incessantly, making it troublesome for specialists to foretell his subsequent transfer.
“The idea has morphed a lot from its early conception that it is generally exhausting to find out its course: cutting down, scaling up, or making an aggressive flip sideways,” stated Robert Mogielnicki of the Arab Gulf States Institute in Washington, following the presentation in 2022.
15
15
15
15
