The Atlantic printed successful piece on Sunday by Caroline Mimbs Nyce focusing on The Gateway Pundit. That is the most recent publication to focus on The Gateway Pundit and our readership within the days main as much as Election Day or ‘election week’ as Democrats wish to name it.
Final week The New York Occasions talked about The Gateway Pundit in three hit items focusing on our web site and fellow conservatives. And we knew that Caroline Nyce was engaged on her report as a result of she reached out to us final week hoping for a response to a report she was writing focusing on The Gateway Pundit. The Atlantic used info from the Middle for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) within the report, a UK group whose function is to censor and silence conservative, unbiased, and populist voices like The Gateway Pundit.
The CCDH simply occurs to be funded by the Biden Regime – so it’s fascinating that they’re going after The Gateway Pundit one week earlier than the election.
Right here is the e-mail we obtained from The Atlantic on their upcoming Gateway Pundit hit piece.
Hello, my identify is Caroline, and I’m a workers author at The Atlantic. I’m engaged on a narrative about some new analysis on the Gateway Pundit’s remark part, and needed to succeed in out for remark.
1. The Middle for Countering Digital Hate examined 120 articles about alleged election fraud, and located that 75 % of these remark sections contained “threats or requires violence.” Any response?2. One such remark cited within the report reads: “For instance: They might present/televise the hangings or lined up and executed by firing squad and have that be a reminder to not attempt to overthrow our structure.” One other remark reads: “Beat the hell out of any Democrat you come throughout right now only for the hell of it.” Do you’ve gotten any touch upon these?
4. General, the researchers discovered greater than 200 feedback “calling for or threatening violence” on the Gateway Pundit web site. Any response?
5. Is Gateway Pundit moderating its remark part? Does it use any of the moderation instruments provided by Disqus?
5. A 2021 Reuters report discovered hyperlinks between the Gateway Pundit and greater than 100 “menacing” messages to election officers. (See: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-election-threats-gatewaypundit) Any remark there?
Deadline for remark can be ASAP. I will be reached at [redacted]. Thanks to your time.
Finest,
Caroline
Here’s a copy of the media request.
The Gateway Pundit responded to The Atlantic. We instructed Caroline we clear and reasonable our feedback and are completely satisfied to take away offensive or threatening feedback after they come to our consideration. The Gateway Pundit has round 300,000 feedback a month, so we do the very best we will.
The timing of this Atlantic hit piece follows the current disgusting fable printed at The Atlantic and written by Jeffrey Goldberg, claiming President Trump wished for “the type generals that Hitler had.” This was an entire lie and has since been debunked.
This was Goldberg’s second huge forgery focusing on President Trump. In 2020 Goldberg claimed with out proof that Trump referred to as World Battle I troopers “losers” and “suckers.” This was even an excessive amount of for Trump-hater John Bolton who debunked this lie previous to the 2020 election.
On Sunday, Caroline Nyce used info from the Biden-funded Middle for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) to smear The Gateway Pundit and our readers. Nyce used info from CCDH to relate a narrative that the remark part at The Gateway Pundit is “notably vivid” and that The Gateway Pundit has remained strikingly related on social media over time. Nyce forgot to say that we had been banned from Twitter for 2 years, we’re nonetheless shadow-banned on the X platform, now we have fully misplaced our Fb visitors due to organizations like CCDH, and we’re blocked, black-listed, and hidden in Google search outcomes.
The Gateway Pundit has been so throttled again on social media that we had been requested to be a plaintiff within the Murthy vs. Missouri Supreme Courtroom case on authorities censorship. The investigation is ongoing.
The Atlantic, the identical junk publication that unfold the Trump suckers and losers lie, then goes on to assault The Gateway Pundit for transferring the narrative “away from conventional fact-based media.” Wow! That took some cojones!
Then, close to the tip of the article, Nyce will get round to the aim of the hit piece. She asks this appalling query, “What precisely the connection is between websites like Gateway Pundit and political violence?” That is fairly a surprising comment contemplating the legacy media and publications like The Atlantic have pushed two would-be assassins to focus on President Trump’s life up to now 4 months!
By way of The Atlantic:
I requested Pasha Dashtgard, the director of analysis for the Polarization and Extremism Analysis and Innovation Lab at American College, what precisely the connection is between websites like Gateway Pundit and political violence. “That’s such a million-dollar query,” he stated. “It’s arduous to inform.” By that, he implies that it’s arduous for researchers and regulation enforcement to know when on-line threats will translate into armed vigilantes descending on authorities buildings. Social-media platforms have solely gotten much less clear with their knowledge for the reason that earlier cycle, making it harder for researchers to suss out what’s taking place on them… These websites simply signify one other potential push mechanism.
This was the actual function of The Atlantic hit piece. The left is pushing a story guilty unbiased media for political violence. The Atlantic is simply setting the desk.
The Atlantic hires a number of contributors with ties to the US intelligence group.
It makes you marvel what they’re planning within the weeks forward.
