The seminar held by the Pakistan Institute of Worldwide Affairs (PIIA) noticed analysis papers being learn out on the Pakistan-India battle.
Researcher Mohammad Usman mentioned that if India have been to cease the water movement to Pakistan, it might threat flooding its personal higher areas.
“But when they stopped our water in the course of the dry seasons, it might be a priority for us as a result of the movement of water is decrease and storage issues probably the most. It could have an effect on our farmers, which may lead to decrease yields,” Usman mentioned.
The researcher mentioned that even when India blocked water, it might require important infrastructure that might take years to construct and likewise billions of {dollars}.
He mentioned within the case of Pakistan and India, Pakistan is the decrease riparian state and India the higher riparian state. However within the case of China and India, China is the higher riparian state and India the decrease riparian state. “That is very true in Brahmaputra the place China can even block India’s water,” he identified. PIIA chairperson Dr Masuma Hasan underscored the necessity to hear completely different voices, particularly the voices of the youth, relating to the latest battle.
Tensions between India and Pakistan escalated after the April 22 Pahalgam assault, which claimed 26 lives.
India carried out precision strikes as a part of Operation Sindoor on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir within the early hours of Might 7.
It was adopted by Pakistan’s try to assault Indian army bases on Might 8, 9, and 10. The Indian facet responded strongly to the Pakistani actions.
The on-ground hostilities ended with an understanding of stopping the army actions following talks between the administrators normal of army operations of either side on Might 10.
