In 1919, President Woodrow Wilson, architect of the post-war worldwide cooperative regime, acknowledged the next relating to financial sanctions: “A nation that’s boycotted is a nation that’s in sight of give up. Apply this financial, peaceable, silent, lethal treatment and there shall be no want for drive. It’s a horrible treatment” (Hufbauer et al., 2007, p. 1).
Advocates and sceptics alike, few right now agree on the prospect that sanctions could present a substitute for struggle. Nonetheless, the usage of sanctions as a deterrent and second-best various to army intervention has change into the coverage of selection in circumstances the place diplomacy is inadequate, and intervention is simply too drastic. Subsequently, the usage of sanctions has been more and more topic to scholarly scrutiny. This scrutiny is especially related right now, as many Western states, with the EU and the US within the forefront, have imposed on Russia what is probably going probably the most encompassing sanction regime since 1945.
This textual content seeks to analyse the at the moment imposed sanction regime from a important perspective and debate its shortcomings based mostly on the massive literature on financial sanctions and the already observable results. I conclude that the sanctions are unlikely to supply any coverage concessions in keeping with the targets of the sender states, and will even produce developments in the wrong way, all of the whereas aggravating human struggling.
The speculation of sanctions – deterrence, after which what?
Observing the results of sanctions isn’t any straightforward job. Baldwin (1985) notes that some results of sanctions could also be onerous or not possible to look at, and the results they do produce will not be essentially dramatic or instantaneous. One ought to, subsequently, be cautious in designating makes an attempt at influencing overseas coverage into dichotomies comparable to “success” or “failure.” This article will not try at doing so however fairly purpose at gauging its effectiveness and level out the disconnect between empirical information, concept, and the acknowledged targets of the senders.
Sanctions are generally claimed to be simpler within the risk stage than within the imposition stage (Drezner, 2003; Morgan et al., 2021). Robert Pape (1997) claimed that imposed sanctions by themselves work in lower than 10% of the circumstances. By his definition, targets should comply absolutely as a direct response to sanctions to be deemed profitable. Others, using wider thresholds of success, discovered that imposed sanctions are efficient round 35% of the time (Baldwin 1985; Hufbauer et al., 2007). Within the latter case, the definition of a efficiently imposed sanction is one which ends in no less than partial coverage change, in accordance with the acknowledged coverage targets of the senders. Almost about our case, this raises the query: What are the acknowledged coverage targets of the senders?
There have been differing claims as to what the targets of the sanctions are. In line with the French, it’s “the collapse of the Russian economic system,” whereas the UK state they’re imposed to “reduce off funding for the Russian struggle machine” (Lough, 2022; UK authorities, 2022). The President of the EU fee proclaimed they’re “designed to take a heavy toll on the Kremlin’s pursuits and their potential to finance struggle,” whereas the Biden administration has not made a transparent coverage goal apart from punishment (EU Fee, 2022a). Evidently, there isn’t a clear unanimous consensus on the aim of the sanctions, however three implicit or specific targets may be recognized for the aim of this evaluation:
- To inhibit the Russian struggle effort in Ukraine.
- Regime change.
- To considerably weaken Russian financial (and thereby political) energy.
These targets lay the muse for my evaluation, and the mechanisms by which they’re imagined to work shall be elaborated on and mentioned individually. It needs to be underlined that evaluating such a dynamic scenario, with no historic precedent to scale, is a problem. The conclusions I arrive at and the empirical information they construct on are at all times inclined to vary, and so they should, subsequently, be corroborated by others.
Halting the Russian struggle effort in Ukraine
There’s appreciable proof that sanctions usually tend to succeed with lesser coverage concessions than main coverage targets, and close to stopping army operations and ceding territory, sanctions have not often succeeded (Hufbauer et al., 2007). Sanctions are primarily an instrument that bites in the long term, but few adhere to the concept the Russo-Ukrainian struggle will stay in its standard kind for ample time for the sanctions to have a decisive impact on the “army operation” (Baer et al., 2022). That is particularly so when Russia nonetheless has methods to bypass them (see part 5). If sanctions are alleged to inhibit the struggle effort, they need to considerably impair the Russian potential to finance its army (see part 5) or incentivise Russia to hunt settlement sooner than deliberate.
Many debates on the sanctions on Russia give attention to shifting the Russian value/profit calculus of sustaining a state of struggle (Baer et al., 2022; Rongved, 2022). The rationale is grounded in bargaining concept, which stipulates that peace is extra more likely to be agreed upon when the prices of struggle, which many speculate have been underestimated by Russia, rise to the purpose the place a continued army operation is now not fruitful. Thereby, sanctions could have an impact by incentivizing Russia to hunt settlement sooner and with smaller calls for than deliberate.
Nonetheless, because the political prices of sustaining a state of struggle rise by the day, Russia is unlikely to ship its troopers again with out some significant territorial good points. If the fight was to stop right now, and we suppose Russia was left even with marginal territorial good points, the West would face a dilemma: One might both steadily alleviate a number of the sanctions, as after 2014, or preserve the total drive of the sanctions at the moment utilized. It appears intuitive that assuaging sanctions is just not a politically viable possibility for the West in any lifelike end result of the struggle, because the demanded concessions voiced by the West are that the army operations stop, and all land occupied by Russian forces be returned to Ukraine (Council of the EU, 2022). Thus, Russia is ready the place the prospect of lifting sanctions is incompatible with attaining any politically viable purpose in Ukraine and is, subsequently, unlikely to be incentivised to hunt settlement sooner or declare much less.
Baldwin (1985) additionally notes that the effectivity of sanctions relies upon as a lot on the goal’s perceptions because the devices used. That is maybe very true for a personalist dictatorship, outlined as a regime by which one highly effective particular person dominates the federal government equipment and its devices; a designation more and more utilized to Russia (Wig, 2022). Mearsheimer (2022), notes that Putin on a number of events has known as the alignment insurance policies of the West and Ukraine “an existential risk” to Russia. If one accepts this notion as true and never a constructed casus belli (which is actually up for debate), the associated fee/profit calculus is now not related to debate, as no quantity of sanctions can distract Putin from acquiring existential safety for Russia.
Some level out {that a} potential “facet impact” of the sanctions could possibly be that the shifted value/profit calculus might make additional aggression by Russia on different territories much less enticing (Rongved, 2022). However this isn’t to draw back from the truth that the sanctions on Russia in 2014 did little to discourage the present coverage. As within the scenario in Ukraine, if all sanctions are expended and the prospect of them being lifted is unrealistic, Russia has no financial incentive to abstain from different “army operations” in its close to overseas, and the deterrent worth of sanctions is misplaced.
The prospect of regime change
In line with Oechslin (2014), democratisation and regime change is probably the most frequent purpose of worldwide financial sanctions. Though not explicitly outlined by any nation formally, the purpose of forcing a regime change utilising sanctions has been voiced — though apparently by chance — by some increased officers of the sender international locations, notably by the US president (Falconbridge et al., 2022; Bloom, 2022). Maybe probably the most distinguished instance of complete sanctions with the purpose of regime change is the sanctions imposed on Iraq from 1990 to 2003, which, as an essential facet notice, “could effectively have been a vital explanation for the deaths of extra folks in Iraq than have been slain by all so-called weapons of mass destruction all through historical past,” in response to one estimate (Mueller & Mueller, 1999, p. 51). The sanctions didn’t trigger regime change, however fairly, the truth is, strengthened the authoritarian grip on energy.
Two mechanisms have been voiced by the media relating to the potential for a sanctions-caused regime change in Russia. One is that ample financial distraught could trigger mass public outrage and a violent overthrow of these in energy (bottom-up), typically referred to in academia as “the naïve concept of sanctions” (Galtung, 1967, p. 389; Rød et al., 2022). The opposite mechanism prevalent within the media is that Putin could also be overthrown by the political elite, by means of a “palace coup” (Bukkvoll, 2022).
Backside-up regime change
Sanctions have traditionally been notoriously weak in inducing each democratisation and regime change in authoritarian states, and will usually have an adversarial impact by additional legitimizing and strengthening authoritarianism (Grauvogel & von Soest, 2013). Analysis on complete sanctions signifies that authoritarian regimes beneath sanctions achieve incentives to allocate rent-seeking alternatives to these supporting the regime as an alternative of directing efforts to the provision of public items for the plenty (Oechslin, 2014). Regimes could even go as far as to lower the availability of public items as a method to intensify the prices of revolting, as was the case in Iraq (Oechslin, 2014). Whereas it is likely to be too early to state whether or not there’s an equal growth in Russia, the Iraq case stands as an illuminating historic precedent. Drezner (2021) factors out that though worldwide relations students are extra usually in disagreement than not, the literature on sanctions is unanimous on the hurt sanctions trigger to the civilian inhabitants of the goal international locations. They’re more likely to set off repression, corruption and backsliding on human growth metrics, however this doesn’t essentially entail outrage towards the federal government, nor energetic makes an attempt at regime change.
As Galtung (1967) notes in his evaluation of the so-called naïve concept of sanctions, the “rally-round-the-flag-effect” tends to be ignored. Current information from the Russia-based unbiased polling centre Levada Middle (2022) contradicts the prediction of bottom-up regime change and signifies a substantial rally-around-the-flag impact within the presidential approval rankings (see determine 1). This additionally mirrors the favored response after the annexation of Crimea. It is likely to be that the current restrictions on freedom of speech are having an affect on the respondents, and one ought to notice that the ballot answering charges have sunk within the aftermath of those restrictions. Nonetheless, even with a considerable margin of error, these outcomes point out that mass protests are nowhere shut in the mean time, regardless of studies of palpable detrimental humanitarian results (Kaner & Shamina, 2022).
Palace coup
Focused sanctions, a time period to explain sanctions that prohibit exercise for particular entities or people, can be a part of the sanctions on Russia. They’re usually heralded as probably the most environment friendly type of sanctions, however there isn’t a sturdy proof that focused sanctions alone are extra profitable than complete sanctions (Drezner, 2011). Kaempfer and Lowenberg (1992) supply a theoretical argument suggesting that monetary sanctions are notably efficient once they “focus revenue losses on teams benefiting from the goal authorities insurance policies;” that’s, within the case of Russia, focusing on the oligarchs.
Nonetheless, Russia’s oligarchs will not be a probable drive of regime change (Soldatov & Borogan, 2022). Whereas a flip within the coverage trajectory of Russia would definitely profit the oligarchs, they’ve little leverage individually, particularly amongst those that haven’t any direct connection to Putin (Stanislav, 2017). Altering the established order necessitates cooperation amongst oligarchs who’re already fragmented and in fierce competitors, in an setting stricken by zero-sum interactions (one particular person’s good points are one other’s loss and vice versa). Whereas the oligarchs’ leverage is contingent on cooperation, this zero-sum aggressive kleptocracy results in an issue of collective motion. Allow us to additionally not neglect that the sanction regime of 2014 did little to incite regime change from the oligarchs, regardless of directing its principal efforts to harm them. Regime change with the oligarchs on the vanguard is, subsequently, unlikely.
One could argue a palace coup doesn’t essentially should be orchestrated by the oligarchs — different actors such because the army or safety companies might effectively be the instigators. Nonetheless, it needs to be famous that the above-mentioned zero-sum aggressive setting goes past oligarchs. In line with Stanislav (2017), “particular person state staff in any respect ranges of the chief hierarchy view the rents they will extract from the economic system as a zero-sum sport” (p. 105). As such, this zero-sum nature might effectively be pathological for the military and safety companies, each of which are sometimes main actors in palace coups. And even within the unlikely case that the present Russian regime crumbles, democratization is simply one of many attainable outcomes. Analysis on overseas pressure-induced regime change in personalist dictatorships observes it’s extra possible {that a} new dictatorship replaces the previous (Escribà-Folch & Wright, 2015).
The petroleum downside – bringing down the Russian economic system
Evidently, the sanctions imposed on Russia in 2014 weren’t ample in inducing coverage concessions and had been a far cry from imploding the Russian economic system. Furthermore, analysts level towards them being a invaluable lesson for Russia in permitting them to witness the structural results of a comparatively cautious sanction regime on the Russian economic system. The 2 so-called ‘nuclear choices’ of the 2022 sanction regime, that’s, probably the most damaging sanction packages the West can impose, have been recognized as these pertaining to finance and petroleum. Attributable to house constraints and the exceeding complexity of assessing the present monetary sanctions, the scope of this evaluation stays restricted to petroleum.
A standard declare within the sanction literature is that sanctions are more and more destabilising when the goal nation’s economic system depends on the exports of 1 or few items, particularly in personalist dictatorships (Escribà-Folch & Wright, 2010). As delivering materials advantages to regime supporters usually derives from overseas income, when overseas income is reduce off, regime supporters are likely to withdraw their help. That is notably related for Russia, which is each more and more designated as a personalist dictatorship, and whose petroleum exports account for ca. 43% of the worth of all Russian exports and 41% of federal finances revenues, as of January 2022 (Koning, 2022; OEC, 2022; МИНФИН, 2022). The Russian federal finances and the worth of its export is, thus, largely linked to the costs of those items. Inhibiting the export of those property is, subsequently, key in bringing the Russian economic system to its knees. Nonetheless, an essential exception from this remark is that sanctions not often destabilise dictatorships which can be additionally essential exporters of petroleum (Escribà-Folch & Wright, 2015, p. 121). The first causes for this are that oil embargos create massive prices for the sender states, all of the whereas these not partaking in an oil embargo achieve entry to discounted oil (Escribà-Folch & Wright, 2015).
There was initially an obvious lack of political will within the West to impose sanctions fully stopping the imports of Russian petroleum, particularly within the EU. For international locations comparable to Hungary, Germany, and Italy, that is no shock, because the logistical difficulties and financial prices related to substituting a sizeable dependence on Russian pipeline gasoline essentially make it troublesome to realize within the quick time period. The continued provide of gasoline is prime for the well being of many of those economies, whereas solely considerably essential for the Russian economic system: 43% of EU-consumed gasoline derives from Russia, whereas roughly 25% of Russian gasoline exports head to the EU (EU Fee, 2022b; OEC, 2022). Nonetheless, it needs to be famous that pure gasoline “solely” accounts for 3% of the Russian export worth (OEC, 2022). Thus, the energy-economic relationship between sure EU members and Russia may be characterised as an asymmetrical dependency, one thing that has change into particularly obvious as Russia just lately reduce the movement of gasoline to Poland, Finland, and Bulgaria. Oil, however, contains a a lot bigger share of income at 35%, and will, subsequently, be the first vector of assault for the sanctions (OEC, 2022).
There are a number of issues with making an attempt to strangle Russian oil exports. Firstly, halting the exports fully hinges on the willingness of China and different markets to adjust to Western will — an unrealistic proposition, in response to Chinese language state officers and IR students alike (Solar et al., 2022; Woo, 2022). Second, the Russian oil manufacturing and export potential is a sizeable issue within the world oil market, and a sudden drop in provide or manufacturing has already produced appreciable instability within the worth of oil. The uncertainty launched by the invasion led to a worth enhance from $78/brl in January, to a excessive of $127/brl in March, considerably stabilized round $100/brl as of July. Relying on the circumstances of OPEC, negotiations with Iran, and the flexibility to substitute Western demand for Russian oil, this development shall be onerous to reverse because the Western imports of Russian oil are shut down by the tip of 2022 (Rystad Vitality, 2022).
That is possible one of many key the explanation why there was a palpable lack of political resolve within the preliminary EU response, whose ban on oil imports got here three months after the US. On reflection, this reluctance is comprehensible, because the unstable costs of petroleum-derived merchandise now start producing massive home prices for the sender states. With quickly growing inflation on prime of adverse post-covid structural issues, the choice to halt Russian oil and petroleum imports could hang-out the EU for a while. Hufbauer et al. (2007) discover that sanctions that inflict home prices on explicit home teams are detrimental to their effectiveness — particularly so when the sanctions embrace retroactively cancelling present contracts, which one ought to “keep away from, in all however excessive conditions” (Hufbauer et al., 2007, p. 177). Together, these actions could trigger an amazing home backlash by affected corporations and people.
Within the case of Iran, Iraq, and Venezuela, who’re or had been all beneath a Western-imposed sanctions regime whereas being main oil producers, neither of the international locations’ economies imploded outright. Though their economies undoubtedly struggled, students level out that help from Russia and/or China is and was key for his or her continued survival (Baer et al., 2022). The scenario of Venezuela, Iran and Iraq largely mimics the place Russia right now finds itself: a big oil-producing nation instantly reduce off from swathes of multilateral financial cooperation, depending on the continued exports of petroleum and reliance on China and rising markets to fill the Russia-West commerce vacuum. As of Could, Rystad Vitality (2022) estimates that Russia’s annual oil-derived tax revenues will hit ranges 45% and 181% increased than in 2021 and 2020 respectively. There are nonetheless fewer international locations which can be sanctioning Russia than these that aren’t, and Asian international locations (notably, India) have already begun importing discounted Russian oil (Menon, 2022). Nonetheless, as oil costs stabilise and the total weight of the sanctions start gnawing on the foundations of the Russian economic system, it’ll falter. However given the provision, time, and infrastructure to commerce with different non-Western markets, the sanctions stay unable to sufficiently harm Russian long-term energy for it to not be a substantial world political actor sooner or later.
Conclusion
On this textual content, I’ve analysed the at the moment imposed sanction regime from a important perspective and debated its shortcomings based mostly on the tutorial literature on sanctions and the already observable results. I’ve argued that the sanctions are unlikely to be efficient in acquiring three recognized implicit or specific targets of the sender states:
Firstly, the sanctions are unlikely to cease the struggle or incentivise Russia to hunt settlement sooner than deliberate, as Russia is ready the place the situations of lifting the sanctions are incompatible with attaining any politically viable purpose in Ukraine. Moreover, because the deterrent worth of sanctions is expended, Russia will possible not be as incentivised to abstain from future aggression on different territories.
Secondly, bottom-up regime adjustments attributable to sanctions have few historic precedents, and in additional circumstances than not produce the other impact by strengthening the authoritarian regime. The appreciable rally-round-the-flag-effect already observable additionally signifies bottom-up regime change is unlikely. Furthermore, a palace coup is sophisticated because of the zero-sum nature reportedly current within the govt political setting.
Thirdly, as there are nonetheless main financial actors keen to commerce with Russia, the Russian economic system is unlikely to be sufficiently broken to have a devastating affect on its long-term place as a world political actor. As well as, the sanctions on oil and petroleum are starting to supply palpable home prices within the sender states.
An essential caveat to my textual content relating to the financial results is the dearth of research on the affect of monetary sanctions, which is commonly recognized with increased imposed sanctions success charges (Hufbauer et al., 2007, p. 47). Additionally, although possible stricken by methodological difficulties, additional evaluation can be wanted to estimate the affect on Russian army tools procurement to extra correctly assess the effectiveness of the sanctions with regard to the inhibition of struggle. Together with these points could have produced a unique conclusion.
If the sanctions are as inefficient as I declare on this textual content, it’s pure to ask what an alternate method could possibly be. Many argue it’s the solely possibility accessible to sign diplomatic discontent and probably the most befitting punitive possibility, as put into phrases by a British diplomat: “there’s nothing else between phrases and army motion if you wish to convey strain upon a authorities” (Marcus, 2010). In any case, the perennial query of “what else?” necessitates a deeper evaluation of the sanction regime and its results and outcomes than what has been offered right here.
References
Baer, D., Bledowski, Ok., Cooper, R., Ehl, M., Fallon, T., Kitney, G., Kornblum, J., Meister, S., Ory, M., Pierini, M., Portella, C., Romanova, T., Steiner, T., Sus, M., Tomic, M. (2022, March 10). Judy Asks: Can Sanctions Finish Russia’s Warfare in Ukraine? Carnegie Europe. Retrieved from: https://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/86606
Baldwin, D. A. (1985). Financial Statecraft. Princeton: Princeton College Press.
Bloom, D. (2022, February 28). UK clarifies it’s not making an attempt to convey down Putin regime over Russia-Ukraine struggle. The Mirror. Retrieved from: https://www.mirror.co.uk/information/politics/uk-clarifies-not-trying-bring-26349409
Bukkvoll, T. (2022, February 24). På sikt kan krige true Putin-regimet. Dagsavisen. Retrieved from: https://www.dagsavisen.no/nyheter/verden/2022/02/24/pa-sikt-kan-krigen-true-putin-regimet/
Council of the European Union. (2022, April 8). Fifth bundle of sanctions in view of Russia’s army aggression towards Ukraine: EU adopts restrictive measures towards an extra 217 people and 18 entities. Retrieved from: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/04/08/fifth-package-of-sanctions-in-view-of-russia-s-military-aggression-against-ukraine-eu-adopts-restrictive-measures-against-an-additional-218-individuals-and-18-entities/
Drezner, D. (2011). Sanctions typically good: Focused sanctions in concept and apply. Worldwide Research Overview, 13(1). 96-108.
Drezner, D. (2021). The use and abuse of financial coercion. Overseas Affairs. Retrieved from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2021-08-24/united-states-sanctions
Escribà-Folch, A., & Wright, J. (2010). Coping with tyranny: Worldwide sanctions and the survival of authoritarian rulers. Worldwide Research Quarterly, 54(2). 335–359.
Escribà-Folch, A., & Wright, J. (2015). Overseas Stress and the Politics of Autocratic Survival. Oxford: Oxford College Press
European Fee. (2022a, February 24). Press assertion by President von der Leyen on Russia’s aggression towards Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/fee/presscorner/element/en/STATEMENT_22_1322
European Fee. (2022b, April 20) In focus: Decreasing the EU’s dependence on imported fossil fuels. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/data/information/focus-reducing-eus-dependence-imported-fossil-fuels-2022-apr-20_en
Falconbridge, G., Stewart, P., Value, M. (2022, March 27) Reactions to Biden saying Putin ‘can’t stay in energy’. Reuters. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/reactions-biden-saying-putin-cannot-remain-power-2022-03-27/
Galtung, J. (1967). On the results of worldwide financial sanctions: With examples from the case of Rhodesia. World Politics, 19(3), 378-416.
Authorities of the UK. (2022, March 15). Overseas Secretary pronounces historic spherical of sanctions on Russia. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/authorities/information/foreign-secretary-announces-historic-round-of-sanctions-15-march-2022
Grauvogel, J., von Soest, C. (2013). Claims to legitimacy matter: Why sanctions fail to instigate democratization in authoritarian regimes. GIGA Working Papers, 235.
Hufbauer, G., Schott, J.J., Elliott, Ok., Oegg, B. (2007). Financial Sanctions Reconsidererd. Washington, DC: Peter G. Peterson Institute for Worldwide Economics
Kaempfer, W, & Lowenberg, A. (1992). Worldwide Financial Sanctions: A Public Selection Perspective. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Kaner, J., Shamina, O. (2022 March 13). Russia sanctions: How the measures have modified each day life. BBC Information. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/information/world-europe-60647543
Koning, J. (2022, March 9). Why Putin is Dropping – The Weak spot of Personalist Dictatorship. PRIO Blogs. Retrieved from: https://blogs.prio.org/2022/03/why-putin-is-losing-the-weakness-of-personalist-dictatorship/
Levada Middle. (2022). Putin’s Approval Ranking. Retrieved from: https://www.levada.ru/en/rankings/
Lough, R. (2022, March 1). French minister declares financial ‘struggle’ on Russia, after which beats a retreat. Reuters. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/world/france-declares-economic-war-against-russia-2022-03-01/
Marcus, J. (2010) Evaluation: Do financial sanctions work? BBC Information. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/information/world-middle-east-10742109
Mearsheimer, J. (2022, March 3). Putin’s Invasion of Ukraine Salon | Ray McGovern, John Mearsheimer – Committee for the Republic. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppD_bhWODDc&t=0s
Menon, S. (2022, April 26) Ukraine disaster: Why India is shopping for extra Russian oil. BBC Information. Retrieved from: https://www.bbc.com/information/world-asia-india-60783874
Mueller, J., Mueller, Ok. (1999). Sanctions of mass destruction. Overseas Affairs, 78(3), 43-53
Nyrup, J. (2022, March 7). Putin bør frykte kupp og revolusjon. Stavanger Aftenblad. Retrieved from: https://www.aftenbladet.no/utenriks/i/dnBEM1/putin-boer-frykte-kupp-og-revolusjon
Oechslin, M. (2014, December). Concentrating on autocrats: Financial sanctions and regime change. European Journal of Political Economic system, 36, 24-40.
Pape, R. A. (1997). Why financial sanctions don’t work. Worldwide Safety, 22(2), 90-136.
Rød, E., Dahl, M., Gjerløw, H., Fjelde, H. (2022, March 16). Et folkelig opprør kan bli Putins skjebne. NRK.no. Retrieved from: https://www.nrk.no/ytring/et-folkelig-oppror-kan-bli-putins-skjebne-1.15894900
Rongved, G. (2022, March 2). Europas syke, syke mann. Minerva. Retrieved from: https://www.minervanett.no/krig-russland-sanksjoner/europas-syke-syke-mann/400724
Rystad Vitality. (2022, Could 2). Lifting the curtain on Russia’s oil and gasoline sectors that may usher in an estimated $260 billion in 2022. Rystad.no. Retrieved from: https://www.rystadenergy.com/newsevents/information/press-releases/lifting-the-curtain-on-russia-oil-and-gas-sectors-that-will-bring-in-an-estimated-240-billion-in-2022/
Simoes, A. J. G, Hidalgo, C. A. (2011). The Financial Complexity Observatory (OEC): An Analytical Instrument for Understanding the Dynamics of Financial Growth. Retrieved from: https://oec.world/en/profile/nation/rus?subnationalDepthSelector=productHS2
Soldatov, A. and Borogan, A. (2022, April 11). Might the Siloviki Problem Putin?. Overseas Affairs. Retrieved from: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russian-federation/2022-04-11/could-siloviki-challenge-putin
Stanislav, M. (2017). The atlas that has not shrugged: Why Russia’s oligarchs are an unlikely drive for change. Daedalus, 146(2), 101-112.
Solar, Y., Ivanov, P., Huang, Y., Repnikova, M., Wishnick, E., Chorzempa, M. (2022, April 7). What Classes Does China Take From Putin’s Warfare? Overseas Coverage. Retrieved from: https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/04/07/china-russia-putin-ukraine-war-lessons-taiwan/
Verder, D., Buyngwon, W. (2011). Why rewards are higher than sanctions. Economics and Politics, 23(2), 220-238.
Wig, T. (2022, February 24). Russland er blitt et klassisk diktatur. Forskning.no. Retrieved from: https://forskning.no/krig-og-fred-russland-statsvitenskap/russland-er-blitt-et-klassisk-diktatur/1985554
Woo, R. (2022, March 19). Chinese language official calls sanctions on Russia more and more ‘outrageous’. Reuters. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/world/chinese-official-calls-sanctions-russia-increasingly-outrageous-2022-03-19/
МИНФИН / Russian Ministry of Finance. (2022, April 18). Quarterly report on execution of the federal finances. Retrieved from: https://minfin.gov.ru/en/statistics/fedbud/?id_65=119254quarterly_report_on_execution_of_the_federal_budget_starting_from_january_1_2011
Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations
