The Board of Administrators of Care Well being Insurance coverage Ltd (CARE) firmly rejected the Burman household’s demand to take away Dr. Rashmi Saluja from her place as non-executive chairperson. This resolution got here through the well being insurer’s Annual Basic Assembly (AGM) on Monday, following mounting stress from the Burmans, who’re the most important shareholders in Religare Enterprises Ltd (REL), which holds a 64% stake in CARE.
In an announcement issued by CARE, the board famous that it had reviewed the Burman household’s communication searching for Saluja’s removing, citing the insurer’s Articles of Affiliation and ongoing authorized investigations. Nevertheless, primarily based on authorized counsel, the board concluded that there was “no trigger for removing,” reinforcing Saluja’s place. The corporate added, “An acceptable response is being despatched to the Proposed Acquirers accordingly.”
The Burman Household had argued that Saluja’s authorized troubles—together with investigations by SEBI for insider buying and selling and an ongoing probe by the Enforcement Directorate (ED)—made her unfit to proceed as chairperson. The ED’s prices embrace allegations of lodging false complaints towards the Burman Household, accusations beneath Sections 420 and 120B of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (previously Indian Penal Code), additional intensifying the household’s push for her removing.
Regardless of the authorized pressures, Saluja has defended her function, describing the Burman Household’s actions as a part of a hostile takeover. In a current interview, she criticized the household for his or her sudden change in stance after years of supporting her management: “They praised and supported administration for six years and now declare they need the corporate for its potential, whereas dismissing the folks accountable for that success.”
The Burman household’s try to consolidate management over REL follows their open provide to accumulate an extra 26% stake within the firm, a transfer that has triggered heightened tensions throughout the boardroom. REL’s controlling stake in CARE, mixed with the continued authorized disputes, underscores the rising friction between Saluja’s management and the Burman household’s strategic aspirations.
